Sociocultural features and problems of Russian society. Sociocultural features and problems of development of Russian society


The higher education system has received fresh breath - to be educated person It is becoming fashionable and profitable again, education carries respect and weight in society. In turn, today specialists are required not only to have deep, highly specialized knowledge, but also methodological training, knowledge of not only the exact sciences, but also the humanities and social sciences, which makes the division of higher education into the humanities, natural sciences and technology to a certain extent arbitrary, and narrow specialization in some cases is unacceptable, especially in industries with high rates of scientific and technological progress. Widespread in last years receive so-called alternative education and distance learning, possible with the use of modern computers and connection to international Internet information systems.

Positive changes in the cultural life of Russia include the emergence large quantity periodicals - newspapers and magazines - as well as a large selection of various literature. Of course, among this abundance there are books whose name is waste paper (Latin - mediocre, low-grade literature that does not have much value). But in most cases, this is literature on almost all branches of knowledge, good content and in good printing performance.

The culture of recent years has expanded in breadth. The range of cultural endeavors is being enriched through the development of various kinds of public associations, movements, clubs, and associations. Cultural exchanges with other countries have become richer, and the feeling of cultural isolation is disappearing. New radio stations are being created. They return to public galleries, museums, many of which have appeared in recent years, and to exhibitions. artistic values, unjustly consigned to oblivion. New orchestras are being organized, including symphony ones, and new theaters are opening. In this regard, let us remember what place the art of theater has always occupied in the cultural life of Russian society. And during perestroika, the theater fulfills its mission. He remains at the forefront of social thought, helping with his means to form civil harmony.

After a period of almost complete collapse of the domestic film production and distribution system, when hundreds of cinemas were closed across the country, there has now been a certain rise in this area of ​​culture. Everything is created more movies, which can already compete with Hollywood products and which are in demand by the viewer, because he is already quite fed up with the foreign surroundings on the screen. Domestic cinema continues to perform several main functions: informational, educational, critical.

The spiritual life of modern Russian society has become much richer thanks to the return of religion (values religious culture). The return of religiosity is associated with the increasing complexity of life, with the search for stability of psychological stability in the face of problems generated by the modern stage of social development, such as alienation from nature, loss of connection with traditions, moral degradation, etc. However, the level of religiosity, i.e. sincere faith is quite low, which reflects only the outward and often formal recognition of religious values.

2. Problems of development of the socio-cultural sphere of Russian society

It can be argued that as a result of the economic, social and political processes of recent years, Russian society has not yet been able to consolidate around common goals and values. Currently, it represents a gradually more complex set of microcommunities that have arisen for a variety of reasons.

It is somewhat more difficult to determine the exact list of problems. However, among them we can identify the main problems, the presence of which is beyond doubt: a fall in demographic indicators, a deterioration in living standards against the backdrop of rising prices and declining wages, social vulnerability of the poor.

According to research, the majority of Russians consider the most painful social problem high prices for housing and communal services. Russians also list the main social problems as lack of funds for food and goods, rising prices and inflation, high prices for medical services and medicines. The listed problems of socio-cultural development are complemented and aggravated by political instability in the world, the development of the financial crisis affecting the growth of the Russian economy, as well as cultural problems. Cultural infrastructure workers are being laid off. The cultural infrastructure in Russia is quite developed, but at the same time it remains ossified, technically and morally outdated. It was strongly influenced by the former social order and its inherent cultural politics; the consequence of this is a focus on centralized management and direct budgetary support, a noticeable deficit own initiative cultural institutions, their unpreparedness to exist in conditions of social and economic pluralism and the free market. As a result, there is a cooling of the population’s interest in the heritage of Russian and world civilization. The average Russian considers going to a bar or watching a TV show to be cultural leisure. This is also a result of the mass craze for cinema, the Internet and the high cost of other cultural entertainment. The level of political culture, the ability to adapt to society, and the quality of performing professional duties directly depend on the general level of culture.

In the field of healthcare, a multi-structure and fragmentation have formed, which worsens the quality of medical services provided.

The second feature of modern healthcare is its rising cost. The development of modern diagnostic and treatment technologies, on the one hand, has increased the quality of diagnosis, improved treatment results, and reduced the time to restore lost health. On the other hand, it has led to an increase in the cost of medical care by several orders of magnitude.

The next problem is the lack of funding, i.e. discrepancy between the real needs of healthcare and the allocated financial resources.

The fourth is a costly healthcare model with excess bed capacity. Previously, poor health care equipment, the lack of effective medicines and advanced technologies were compensated for by a large number of hospitals, an entire army of doctors and a strong clinic. Over the past 10 years, the preventive component of healthcare has weakened, and from preventive it became curative. As a result, a bloated bed network and a large number of inefficiently operating hospitals emerged.

It can also be noted that in general, Russians' view of the future is becoming more optimistic compared to the last decade. People attach more importance not only to economic and political issues, but also to relationships, careers, and a healthy lifestyle. The desire for the latter is especially pronounced against the backdrop of the problems of alcoholism and drug addiction.

Also on social cultural development Russia is affected by terrorism, the role of oligarchs in the political and economic life of the country, the environmental situation, bureaucracy, and the presence of extremist and fascist youth groups.

The aggravated ideological and socio-cultural problems of modern Russia are reflected in the state of the entire society.

If we talk about the problems of modern Russian culture, we can highlight the following. Firstly, this is the tendency of social stratification between generations, which is reflected in such socio-cultural foundations as way of life, as well as value orientations. Contradictions between generations (the problem of “fathers and sons”), and, above all, at the psychological and ideological levels, are inherent in all societies, regardless of territorial, social and historical factors. But they are especially aggravated in an era of change, transition from one social system to another, when the worldview of the “fathers”, formed in the old system, cannot “get along” with the new reality, because the idea of ​​continuity breaks down. Therefore, the old and middle generations of Russians and the young generation are at different poles of national culture.

The second problem of modern Russian culture is the gap between the potential influence of culture on society and the actually existing ability of the masses to master it and use it in everyday sociocultural practice. Dynamism modern life caused a significant complication in the structure and content of people’s relationships with each other, with the natural and cultural (artificial) environment. This is expressed in such objective indicators as a quantitative increase in qualitatively diverse objects, scientific ideas, artistic images, patterns of behavior and interaction. In addition, the possibilities for choosing forms and places for leisure, recreation, and satisfying intellectual and aesthetic interests have significantly expanded.

But these opportunities are often not realized, and, above all, due to the constant rise in prices of all types of services, including cultural ones - the cost of books, tickets to concerts, theaters, cinemas, and sometimes to exhibitions of works of fine art, etc. d. All this narrows and reduces the actual consumption of modern cultural values.

But the biggest problem of modern Russian culture is the confrontation between the so-called “serious” and “folk” culture (primarily in the sphere artistic culture) and "mass culture". By the way, Russia has almost always been characterized by the fact that true (highly artistic) art is always the art of the past, not the present.

The most significant problems are related to the general state of the spiritual life of Russian society.

The processes of erosion of spiritual identity are intensifying Russian culture, the danger of its westernization increases, the historical and cultural identity of individual territories, settlements, and small towns is lost. The commercialization of cultural life led to the unification of customs, traditions and lifestyles (especially of the urban population) according to foreign models. The consequence of the mass replication of the Western way of life and behavior patterns is the standardization of cultural needs, the loss of national and cultural identity and the destruction of cultural individuality.

The indicators of the spiritual life of society are declining. The gap between specialized and ordinary levels of cultural development continues to grow. Cinema and music are losing popularity. There is a sharp decline in the role of television in introducing the population to art. Contemporary domestic art is almost completely absent from the preferences of the population. Reduced demands on artistic level works of art led to an expansion of the flow of low-quality literature, cinema, and music, which significantly deformed the aesthetic taste of the population.

There is a significant reorientation of public consciousness - from spiritual, humanistic values ​​to the values ​​of material well-being. In many ways, such moral values ​​as love for “ small homeland", mutual assistance, mercy. Essentially, culture begins to lose the functions of social regulation, social consolidation and spiritual and moral self-determination of a person, approaching a state that in sociology is characterized by the concept of anomie, i.e. abnormality, dysfunctional. The values ​​and norms that make up the moral vertical and the spiritual core of Russian culture are today unstable, vague, and contradictory.

Of particular concern is the younger generation, which is increasingly moving away from spiritual culture. This is largely facilitated by the crisis of the education system, the policy of the media, which introduce immorality, violence, and disdain for the profession, work, marriage, and family into consciousness as the norm. Inconsistency between the declared priority of universal human values ​​and real life leads to the destruction of moral foundations and legal chaos.

At the level public policy There is an underestimation of culture as a consolidating and meaning-forming factor, as the most important resource for the spiritual transformation of Russia. The main emphasis in state cultural policy is on the development of mass commercial culture, which is considered as a necessary component of a democratic social order and market economy, the basis of civil society and the rule of law. On the one hand, market principles of cultural organization weaken managerial dictates, involve the population (consumers) in participation in cultural policy, eliminate ideological influence, expand the capabilities of cultural and leisure institutions through new sources of financing, allow increasing the wage fund, etc. On the other hand, there is a commercialization of culture, the erosion of free forms of cultural and leisure activities, and a shift in cultural priorities from the content of activities to making a profit. Artistic creativity, freed from censorship, found itself under economic oppression. The film industry is going through a deep crisis. The video market is monopolized by the pirate industry. The consequences of this commercialization process, the extent of which is still difficult to predict, is a matter of concern for cultural workers.

So, the problem of confrontation between “serious” and “mass culture” is the most complex and cannot be solved by any special instructions from the government. There is only one principle here - “serious” culture should be subsidized, it should be supported financially. This could be government support (budget funds) or help from sponsors, but it is help. Because the market as a mechanism for creating and distributing highly artistic values ​​to the masses is not effective. Everywhere, not only in Russia, say, a symphony orchestra or opera and repertoire Theatre of Drama They won’t survive without subsidies, but a pop group will survive because... it is an integral part of show business, i.e. "mass culture".

The process of transition from traditional to modern society quite complicated.

The transition from traditional to modern society is very dramatic both for society as a whole and for individual person. Almost all life ideas, the system of priorities, rationality, and the mental makeup of the personality dominant in society change.

The most common types of modernization in world practice are two.

The first type of modernization processes, called “catch-up modernization.” Russia has been moving along this path of development, starting with Peter the Great’s reforms, when, in fact, the insufficiency of economic, military, managerial (bureaucratic), educational potential, and the overall level of civilization in comparison with the countries of Western Europe were recognized as a problem.

Communications of Russian society connecting the country with external environment, which throughout the modern era was primarily Western civilization, were controlled and limited for a long time. The ideology and practice of the “Iron Curtain” in the USSR were, perhaps, the most a shining example manifestation of this kind of control over communications.

Russia embarked on the path of “catch-up modernization,” when it borrowed technological techniques and instrumental knowledge related to the fields of industry, science, and military affairs. Authoritarian character state power And political culture There was practically no doubt. Peter I, having visited Europe, was not interested in European democracy and individualism.

Within the framework of the Russian modernization project, institutional and value transformations are necessary. Such a large country as Russia cannot rely on the exploitation of natural and cultural objects preserved from pre-modernization times (for example, on the development of tourism as the engine of the national economy), which, however, is possible for smaller countries.

A positive, adaptation solution for the Russian sociocultural system is the removal of all obstacles and restrictions on the paths of intercultural interaction between the donor civilization, i.e. The West, and the recipient civilization, i.e. Russia. Natural limiters in this direction are national culture, language and level of economic development, level of overall solvency, ability to pay for foreign cultural innovations.

The Russian sociocultural tradition has been dichotomous since the Mongol-Tatar invasion; before that, Kievan Rus developed as a European state.

In the conditions of Russia at the beginning of the 21st century, a potential contender for the role of an object of modernization, capable of taking risks while implementing rational life choice, is middle class, the basis of the future civil society. Given fairly stable economic development, the middle class, as a rule, occupies the middle part of the political spectrum, remaining quite indifferent to both right- and left-wing extremism. Representatives of the middle class gravitate more towards peaceful, evolutionary processes, and not at all towards revolutionary changes.

During the years of post-Soviet reforms, the first free generation of Russians was formed, whose primary socialization took place in conditions of freedom, mainly focused on Russia’s inclusion in the world, i.e. Western civilization.

At the same time, some adaptation to the national sociocultural tradition is an important condition for the assimilation of implanted foreign cultural experience, including values, relationships, symbolic meanings and cultural codes. All this has gained some clarity in recent decades.

For successful Russian modernization in the near future, it is necessary to maintain a higher rate of sociocultural dynamics than the rate natural for Western societies"late modern".

Chapter I. The Lao people in a cultural and historical retrospective.

§ 1. A brief excursion into the history of the Lao people.

§ 2. Ethnodemographic structure of Laotian society.

§ 3. Socio-economic processes in Laotian society.

Chapter II. Specifics sociocultural development Laotian society.

§ 1. Dialectics of traditions and innovations in the development of Laotian society.

§ 2. Sociocultural values ​​of Buddhism in religious and secular practice.

Chapter III. Project empirical research dominant personality type in Lao society.

§ 1. The problem of the adequacy of the dominant personality type to sociocultural changes.

§ 2. Social and psychological portrait of a resident of the country of Lao.

§ 3. Typological analysis of the daily life of Laotian society.

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic "Sociocultural features of the development of modern Laotian society"

Relevance of the topic. Some scientists call the 21st century Asian, meaning significant quantitative and qualitative changes taking place in Asian countries. The Asian region is becoming increasingly important in the context of global development: the population is growing rapidly: according to demographers, by 2025 the annual population growth in Asia will be approximately 50 million people, while in the world as a whole -40 million people1, a number Asian countries is progressing significantly in socio-economic, political and cultural relations. Each country and individual groups of countries contribute to the development of the Asian region.

The specificity of the sociocultural development of the peoples of Southeast Asia, including Laos, is determined by the interaction of traditions, which are very tenacious in the region, with innovations arising from the modernization of these countries. Here East and West meet: the East as the custodian of traditional values, which are its essence, and the West as the bearer of innovations aimed at transforming traditions and adapting them to new sociocultural realities. Here one can discern both opposition and interpenetration, that is, dialectical unity. This is not about the “struggle of the new with the old,” but about the “integration” of traditional Eastern institutions into modern social reality. Otherwise, there is a threat of destruction of the people’s way of life that has evolved over centuries.

The topic seems relevant from both theoretical and practical positions, since the successful transformation of society is associated with understanding the ongoing processes, identifying patterns of development for their possible consideration in the practice of reforming society.

1 Calculated from: Population and Society. Information bulletin of the Center for Demography and Human Ecology of the Institute of National Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences.-M. - 1999. - No. 38. - P. 2-3.

State of scientific development of the topic. Problems of development of the peoples of Asian countries have always been the subject of close attention of scientists around the world. However, Laos came into their field of vision only at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries, after the country was included in French Indochina. The first works devoted to the new colony were predominantly ethnographic in nature. A particularly significant contribution to the study of Laos at this time was made by the French orientalist and expert on Indochina Auguste Pavy, who devoted twenty years of his life to this country. In subsequent works, published in the 30s of the 20th century, the idea of ​​a civilizing mission of the metropolis was pursued, without whose participation it was believed that the country’s progress would be impossible. French historiography of Laos contains calls to unite Western countries (USA, France, UK) in the face of the “communist danger” in Asia. A number of works by French scientists are published on Southeast Asia, including Laos, where the dominant position was about the supposedly immanent property of the Laotians, determined by the principle “nothing will cost” (bo-pen-nyang), which impedes independent development.

English-language historiography of Laos is characterized by an emphasis on the stagnation of the country’s economic development, almost untouched by modernizing trends, on its strong dependence on foreign assistance, primarily from the United States, and on political and economic disunity various areas country due to geographical conditions and underdeveloped infrastructure. Fundamental studies of the economy of colonial and pre-colonial Laos are the works of J.M. Halpern, published in the 60s of the 20th century, in which the author analyzes in detail the evolution of agrarian relations in the country. Currently, the magazine “Laos” is published in English, which publishes information about the daily life of the people. Thus, the article “Successful Businessman” by Leuth Saysana describes the activities of a famous Laotian businessman who created the first commercial bank in Laos in 1992 with an initial capital of $5 million. USA\

1 See: Laos. - Vientiane, 1995. - P. 26 - 27.

Lao national literature dedicated to the history of the country is heterogeneous. It is possible to distinguish three groups of authors and, accordingly, works with a certain orientation. One group of authors (K.D. Sasorit, S. Na Champasak) is influenced by Western European ideas. The other reflects nationalist sentiments based on Buddhist theory. These include the works of B. Suwannawong, devoted to the substantiation of the Buddhist path of development, in opposition to both Western capitalism and “communist socialism.” The works of the third group of authors (M.S. Vilavong) contain only lists of dynasties and rulers, as well as chronicle messages. Moreover long time(40s - 70s of the XX century) works of Laotian authors were published only in French.

Sources and literature in the Lao language are represented primarily by official documents, such as the Constitution of the Lao PDR (Vientiane, 1992), as well as the Laws on Human Rights, Labor, industrial enterprises, about foreign investments, about legal activities. National scientific literature in the Lao language began to develop only after the country gained independence. Moreover, the attention of scientists is attracted both by events of distant antiquity and modern processes, in terms of content, they are interested in problems of culture, economics, and building a new life. Notable publications of the 1990s include Lan Xang's Legacy, published in Vientiane in 1996 (partially translated into French and English). One of the authors of this collection, Hamphan Rattanavong, in the article “On the national and world heritage of Luang Prabang” characterizes the historical and cultural significance this city, describing the high level of culture and religious practice of the people inhabiting it. Another author, Neng Xeyvang, in the article “Hmong in Laos”, himself ethnic background Hmong, po professional status employee of the Ministry of Information and Culture, describes the legendary thousand-year history migration of the Meo people (Hmong - self-name) in the distant past from China to Laos, their life in the environment of multi-ethnic Laotian society \ Other notable

1 See: Lanxang Heritage Journal. - Vientiane, 1996 (in Laotian). The work is the collection “Theory and Politics” (Vientiane, 1997), which reflects the role of the party in solving socio-economic and cultural problems.

Contemporary issues The lives of the people are reflected primarily in magazine publications. Magazines such as “Party Construction” and “New Morning Dawn” are periodically published, which discuss issues related to economic development, the introduction of market relations, the development of individual provinces of the country, as well as issues of education, culture, overcoming outdated traditions and old beliefs1. A common genre in scientific and journalistic literature is interviews, which are willingly given by the top officials of the republic. Thus, in one of the issues of the magazine “Party Construction” for 1998, an interview was published with Secretary General NRPL Khamtay Siphandong, which is characterized by current situation countries2.

Russian historiography of Laos began relatively recently. Information in Russian about the life of the Laotian people is concentrated in reference literature. First of all, this is a periodically republished reference book called “Laos” (M.D966, 1980, 1994), containing regional information, including a historical outline, data on the development of the economy and culture. There are other publications of this kind, for example: Lao PDR. Directory. - M.: Politizdat, 1985, and also: E.V. Kobelev. Lao People's Democratic Republic. - M.: Knowledge, 1987 and others.

For Soviet researchers, Laos was of interest primarily as a country of a victorious people's democratic revolution, where the construction of socialism began, bypassing capitalist development. In those days, there was close cooperation between two countries: Laos and the USSR, books were published in Russian describing the struggle of the Laotian people for national independence, the beginning

1 See, for example: Nyongsy Likhamsuk. Education as a means of eliminating outdated traditions and old beliefs // New Morning Dawn, 1998. - No. 1 - 2. - P. 29 - 33 (in Laotian).

2 See: Party building. - Vientiane. - 1996. -№13. - pp. 1-14 (in Laotian). socialist transformations. These are, in particular, the works of the historian V.A. Kozhevnikov, who called Laos in his dissertation research a little-known country About Laos from the same period - the works of M.I. Isaev, G.G. Kadymov, Yu.Ya. Mikheev 4 and others . The works of a prominent political figure in the Laotian liberation movement, Kayson Phomvihane 5, were also published in Russian.

The limited number of works directly devoted to the topic under study does not indicate a lack of interest on the part of sociologists and cultural scientists. The focus of scientists' attention is rather on individual aspects of the phenomenon being studied. There are studies by economists devoted to Laos, first of all, this is V.V. Simonov’s monograph “Economic Development of Laos” (Moscow, 1988), which analyzes the economic processes of the 50-80s of the 20th century. A look at the economy of Laos at the end of the 19th and end of the 20th centuries is contained in the works of S.I. Ioanesyan “Laos. Socio-economic development (late XIX-60s of the XX century)" (M., 1972) and in the section "Lao PDR. The transition to a market economy (experience of reforms)" in the collection "Socio-economic development of the countries of Southeast Asia: lessons for Russia" (Moscow, 1997). Interesting works of literary scholars have been published, for example, the book by Yu.M. Osipov “Essays on the History of Laotian Classical Literature” (St. Petersburg, 1991), religious scholars, especially we're talking about about a serious study by A.S. Agadzhanyan “The Buddhist path in the 20th century.

1 See: Kozhevnikov V.A. The struggle of the peoples of Laos for national independence (1917-1962). - M., 1969. Abstract of thesis. . Candidate of Historical Sciences - P. 3. See also his work: Essays on the modern history of Laos. - M., 1979.

2 Isaev M.I. Indochina chronicle. - M., 1987.

3 Kadymov G.G. Renewed Laos. - Kyiv, 1987.

4 Mikheev Yu.Ya. Lao People's Democratic Republic - 10 years old. - M., 1985.

Religious values ​​and modern history of Theravada countries" (M., 1993), in which Buddhism is considered as a sociological phenomenon influencing daily life people. Among the works of a religious nature, we note the study of the Russian pre-revolutionary author V.A. Kozhevnikov “Buddhism in comparison with Christianity” (Petrograd, 1916), which notes the mystery of this world religion; the author calls Buddha the greatest of pessimists, promising those who believe in him the peace of eternal non-existence, in contrast to Christ, who promises the believer eternal life. Material about Buddhism is also contained in the work of G.A. Shpazhnikov “Religions of the Countries of Southeast Asia” (Moscow, 1980), where, in particular, it is emphasized that religious traditions are gradually receding and their transformation is taking place. There are also journalistic works: the book of journalist V. Skvortsov, who devoted fifteen years of his life to this “ancient land of the kingdom of ten thousand elephants,” “White Elephants of Fortune” (Moscow, 1983), is dedicated to the uniqueness of life in Laos. The author's vision is optimistic, because the white elephant is a symbol of success. The people’s struggle for independence is reflected in the collection of essays, articles, stories, and memoirs of journalists from different countries who worked in Laos, “The Path to Victory” (M., 1985), where, in particular, there is an interview of the Laotian writer Suvanthong Buphanuvong with the Russian writer Eremey Parnov, which emphasizes that for many centuries the Laotian people were at risk of destruction as a nation 1.

There is an extensive literature in which the problems of the peasantry of the East are analyzed, a typology of Eastern societies is given, their specifics are considered in comparison with the West 2. And, conversely, works characterizing the problems of education, moral norms, and etiquette of the peoples of the South-Eastern region are rare.

1 See: Path to Victory. - M., 1985. - P. 148.

See: Issues of typology of peasant societies of Asia. - M., 1980; Gordon A.B. Peasantry of the East: historical subject, cultural tradition, social community. - M., 1989; Great unknown. Peasants and farmers in the modern world. - M., 1992; Moscow Oriental Studies. Essays, research, development. - M., 1997.

Asia Relevant for modern peasant societies, which includes Laos, are the problems associated with their transformation towards the market. In this regard, the question of the adequacy of the dominant personality type to sociocultural changes acquires fundamental importance. Question

The correspondence of individuals to a changing society was also occupied by M. Weber, who talked about the “spirit” of capitalism, which must master the masses in order for capitalism to become a reality. 2. The same problem is raised by P. Sztompka, commenting on and developing Weber’s views. This issue turns out to be a pressing issue for both Laos and Russia. It is no coincidence that Novosibirsk sociologists write about this, analyzing the processes of formation of business entities in the agricultural sector 4. This study puts forward a hypothesis about dominance in Laotian society traditional type personality.

In terms of implementing an empirical research project, publications related to the use of “ qualitative methods"in sociology, in particular, the work "The Fates of People: Russia. XX century Biographies of families as an object of sociological research" (Moscow, 1996), as well as the monograph "Everyday life of the mid-90s through the eyes of St. Petersburg residents" (St. Petersburg, 1999). In addition, the ideas of Kazan scientists developing questions of theory and methodology of applied research were used: these are the works of professors E.S. Rakhmatullin, M.A. Nugaev, R.M. Nugaev, T.G. Islamshina, F.G. Ziyatdinova, N S. Fatkhullina, V. K. Paderina, A. Z. Gilmanov, as well as works

V.P.Modestova, V.V.Fursova, V.A.Belyaeva, A.L.Salagaeva,

1 See: Ethnography of childhood. Traditional forms education of children and adolescents among the peoples of South and Southeast Asia. - M., 1988; Etiquette among the peoples of Southeast Asia. - St. Petersburg, 1999.

See: Weber M. Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism // Selected works. - M., 1990. - P. 81. See: P. Shtompka. Sociology social change. - M., 1996.

4 See: Social trajectory of reformed Russia. - M., 1999. -P.279 - 319.

A.P. Kulapin, L.G. Egorova, F.T. Nezhmetdinova, L.R. Nizamova, I.G. Yasaveev and other scientists.

The object of this study is Laotian society in the context of its movement from traditional society to modern.

The subject of the research is sociocultural processes in the transforming Laotian society. Sociocultural processes are understood as: the history of the emergence, formation and development of multi-ethnic Laotian society, reflection of history in literary process, socio-economic forms of economic activity, the socializing function of the family, the influence of Buddhism on the daily life of the people.

The purpose of the study is to determine the sociocultural features of the development of Laotian society.

Achieving this goal is facilitated by solving the following tasks: describing in historical retrospect the processes of emergence, formation, development of Laotian society in the unity of ethno-demographic, socio-economic, cultural components; analysis of traditional institutions of Lao society (rural community, Buddhism) in terms of their adaptation to modern social realities;

Development of a project for an empirical study of the dominant personality type in Laotian society;

Description of the generalized image of a resident of the Lao country;

Determining the adequacy of the dominant personality type to sociocultural changes.

Research methodology. The methodological basis of the study is: a systematic approach to the study of such a complex object as Eastern society, the principle of historicism, as well as a synthesis of the categories of historical and logical. Traditional institutions eastern society- the rural community and the Buddhist monastery are considered from the standpoint of structural functionalism. The ideas of the classics of world sociology were used as fundamental: K. Marx - about the peasantry as a subject of historical development, about its unity with the earth as a natural laboratory, M. Weber - about the “spirit” of capitalism as the source of the emergence of a rational organization of production - to “overlay” them on modern Laotian society in order to understand the social cultural processes. The empirical research project used typological analysis to identify the dominant personality type in Lao society.

Scientific novelty The research is as follows.

1. A synthesis of historical, theoretical, empirical approaches to the study of Laotian society has been carried out, which is considered as a systemic object - in the unity of its ethno-demographic, socio-economic and cultural components and their interrelations.

2. A project has been developed for an empirical study of the dominant personality type in Laotian society.

3. A socio-psychological portrait of a resident of the country of Lao has been created.

The scientific and practical significance of the study lies in the fact that in the context of a transforming society it performs a reflexive function, as well as a theoretical and methodological function, serving as the basis for empirical research. Materials related to ethno-demographic processes in Lao society can be used in teaching a course in demography, materials related to the development of an empirical research project can be reflected in the teaching of applied sociology.

Approbation of work. The main ideas of the study are presented internationally scientific-practical conference

Organizational and economic problems municipal government", held at the Naberezhnye-Chelny branch of KSU on May 26, 2000, as well as in two publications.

The structure of the work corresponds to the purpose, objectives of the study, the logic of data analysis and synthesis. The dissertation consists of an introduction, three chapters, a conclusion, a bibliography and appendices.

Conclusion of the dissertation on the topic "Social structure, social institutions and processes", Kenkongkham Suban

CONCLUSION

An analysis of the historical past and cultural processes characteristic of Laos indicates that during the existence of the country social institutions have been repeatedly destroyed and recreated, they have not yet achieved stability. State entities on the territory of modern Laos have not been stable for centuries, holding back the socio-economic and cultural development of the people. Therefore, economic backwardness has acquired a traditional character.

Laos is at the center of interaction between different cultures, which determined the uniqueness of its ethnic composition, demographic development, social structure, and economic processes.

Ethnically, it is a multi-ethnic country with the dominant ethnolinguistic group, the Lao-Tai, making up two-thirds of the country's population. The whole history of the Lao people is their selfless struggle for survival, for the preservation of their ethnocultural identity. The consolidation of the peoples of the country into a single sociocultural community has not yet been completed. Ethnic groups maintain their unity due to the recognition of the right to dominance by the numerically dominant and most developed ethnic group in all respects.

The demographic feature of the country is the small population and weak population of its territory, as a result of which there is still a significant proportion of uncultivated land.

Agriculture remains the basis of the Laotian economy, and this is a traditionally backward sector of the economy: land productivity is very low. The cultivated areas are predominantly small in size, so the methods of caring for the fields are primitive. Due to their high cost, small-scale mechanization tools are available to few farms. Development Agriculture It is carried out mainly in an extensive way - by involving new lands into economic circulation by a growing rural population using backward agricultural technology. Progressive transformation of the country's agriculture - exclusively difficult task. The main difficulties: the backward scientific and technical base of agriculture, the archaic social structure of the population, the lack of qualified personnel to implement the country's development program. As a result, Laos remains among the world's least developed countries, with about half of the country's residents having incomes below the official poverty level.

For centuries, Buddhism has been and remains a sociocultural feature of Lao society as a traditional religious institution and at the same time a symbol of the unity of the Lao people. Time has shown its compatibility with any socio-economic formation, that is, Buddhism has significant adaptive capabilities. Buddhism is, above all, the foundation of Laotian culture. The formation and development of Laotian literature and art until the 19th century is associated with the adoption of Theravada Buddhism as the state religion in the middle of the 14th century.

Buddhism performed and continues to perform a political function: it was used to impart a divine character to the personality of the king and the regime of state power. The declaration of the country's independence does not mean the removal of the church and monasticism from society; there are enough opportunities to adapt the teachings of the Buddha to the policies of the Lao PDR government. The Buddhist Sangha has always been the spiritual power base. At the same time, it was truly a stronghold of culture, performed educational and educational functions, and also provided medical assistance to the population.

Buddhism is deeply rooted in society and largely determines the lifestyle and mentality of approximately two-thirds of the country's population. Half of them can be qualified as active, faithful Buddhists, observing all the precepts of the Teaching, the rest are passive Buddhists, for whom religion is associated primarily with the preservation of traditional norms and customs. Among the followers of Buddhism, the majority are ethnic Lao, living in cities and plains with irrigated rice cultivation. Buddhism is the dominant religion, but not the official religion of the country. Historically, it has become a tradition to identify Buddhism with national ideology and culture.

The specifics of the modern economic state of society are determined by two main trends: the preservation of traditional institutions of society, which include the peasant community, patron-client relations, and the emergence of innovations caused by the development of the market institution and accompanying changes.

The evolution of society from a patriarchal community to the formation of elements of socialism and capitalism indicates its movement from traditional to modern society. This is a movement from communal life, from a self-sufficient rural community with family, kinship and neighborhood ties, which satisfies only minimal needs, to a market-type society, with a rational organization of labor, with profit as the goal of work.

The age-old traditions of community life at the turn of the 20th - 21st centuries come into conflict with the course towards economic renewal associated with the development of market relations. In new conditions public life the traditional qualities of the Laotian people associated with running a self-sufficient peasant economy, primarily practical economic skills and abilities, because agricultural labor and craft constituted unity, must be supplemented with completely new ones, adequate to a market society, namely: enterprise, determination, competitiveness, the ability to rationally organize the economy to make a profit, that is, to become imbued with the “spirit” of capitalism, as M. Weber put it. The individual must gain independence from the community and self-sufficiency. Under these conditions, the values ​​cultivated by Buddhism for centuries: renunciation of the world, of possession, of property, preaching of contemplation turn out to be unclaimed, hindering the development of society. The principles of Buddhism regarding the participation of people in social and economic life are being revised: entrepreneurship is encouraged if it is of a “righteous” nature, a strategy for curbing private property is being developed, and a mechanism for the fair distribution of material wealth is being developed. In the process of transformation of society there is a transformation human individuality- from an individual who was a single whole with the community, passive, lacking initiative, content with little, to a personality of an individualistic type with opposite properties: independent, active, ready to take risks, capable of overcoming the traditional line associated with the hope that “maybe everything will work out.”

At the same time, despite the deep roots of Buddhism in the consciousness and behavior of the people, the respect for monks on the part of the population, secularization occurs various fields life of society. Buddhism is increasingly becoming a set practical advice for everyday life, that’s why it is called folk. The number of devout Buddhists is decreasing, and the number of passive Buddhists is growing. This trend applies primarily to young people, for whom the word “vat” (monastery) is associated with the concept of something traditional, that is, old-fashioned, outdated. To maintain adherents among younger generations, Buddhism must transform itself in line with the transformation of Western-style modern life.

The prospects for creating a new economic system in a country with a predominance of subsistence farming are associated by the country's leadership primarily with economic assistance from the West. At the same time, actions are being taken to restore the once developed relations with Russia. It is believed that the conditions for the development of the country and attracting foreign investment are favorable: market transformations are carried out while maintaining the one-party system, political stability, and public order.

The evolution of society from traditional to modern also changes the worldview of the people: from mythological to realistic, from sublime, figurative, poetic perception of the world to rational.

Thus, the modernization of society is accompanied by the modernization of the individual, the latter means the elimination of traditional traits and the formation of new ones, adequate to a rationalistic society.

List of references for dissertation research Candidate of Sociological Sciences Kenkongkham Suban, 2000

1. Weber M. Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism // Selected works. M.: Progress, 1990. - P. 44 - 272.

2. Questions of the typology of peasant societies in Asia. M.: INION, 1980.- 136 p.

3. Tender notebooks. First issue. St. Petersburg, 1997. - 128 p. Gilmanov A.Z. Prospects for the formation of local self-government // Sociological studies. - 1998. -№11.- P.26 - 29.

4. Gordon A.B. Peasantry of the East: historical subject, cultural tradition, social community. M.: Nauka, Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 1989. - 220 p.

5. Grushin B.A. Historicism // Philosophical encyclopedic Dictionary. -M, 1983.-S. 227-228.

6. Dubin B. Success in Russian // Monitoring of public opinion. - M. - 1998. No. 5. - P. 18 - 22.

7. Ziyatdinova F.G. Social problems of education. M.: Publishing Center of the Russian State University for the Humanities, 1999. 282 p.

8. Ioanesyan S.I. Laos. Socio-economic development. The end of the XIX 60s of the XX century. - M.: Science, Main Editorial Board of Oriental Literature, 1972. - 184 p.

9. Isaev M.P. Indochina chronicle. M.: Politizdat, 1987.- 287 p.

10. Islamshina T.G. Ethnic values ​​of a multiethnic society: a sociological essay. Kazan: Publishing house KSTU, 1996. - 247 p.

11. Kadymov G.G. Renewed Laos. Kyiv: Politizdat of Ukraine, 1987. - 120 p.

12. Kistanov V. On the threshold of the Asian century // Asia and Africa today.-M. 1997. - No. 1. - P. 24-27.

13. Kobelev E.V. Lao People's Democratic Republic. - M.: Knowledge, 1978. - 64 p.

14. Kozhevnikov V.A., Sedov L.A. Laos. Geographgiz, 1962. - 46 p.

15. Kozhevnikov V. A. The struggle of the peoples of Laos for national independence (1917-1962). Abstract of thesis. . Candidate of Historical Sciences M., 1969.-21 p.

16. Kozhevnikov V.A. Essays on the modern history of Laos. M: Science, Main Editorial Board of Oriental Literature, 1979. - 245 p.

17. Kozhevnikov V.A. Buddhism in comparison with Christianity.-Petrograd: M. Merkushev’s printing house, 1916. 633 p.

18. Who owns the culture? Social sciences and prospects for the study of sociocultural change. Abstracts of the international scientific conference. Kazan, 1998. - 110 p.

19. Kulapin A.P. Sociological theories: traditions and modernity (historical and methodological essay). Kazan: KFEI Publishing House, 1995.128 p.

20. Lebedev B.K. Social type personality. Theoretical essay. -Kazan: Publishing house Kazansk. Univ., 1971. 64 p.

21. Lenin V.I. The agrarian question and “critics of Marx” // PSS. T.5. - P. 95 -268.

22. Lenin V.I. About the state // PSS. T. 39. - P. 64 - 72.

23. Listopadov N. Mosques against the backdrop of pagodas // Asia and Africa today.-1996.- No. 3.-S. 64-68.

24. Laos. Directory. M.: Nauka, Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 1980. - 262 p.

25. Laos. Directory. M.: Publishing company “Eastern Literature” RAS, 1994.-276 p.

26. Lao People's Democratic Republic. Directory. - M.: Politizdat, 1985. 110 p.

27. Marx K. Introduction // Marx K., Engels F. Soch.- T. 12.- P. 709-738.

28. Marx K. Theories of surplus value // Marx K., Engels F. Soch. T. 26, part II. - P. 3 - 426.

29. Marx K. Criticism political economy// Marx K., Engels F. Soch.-T. 46, part 1.-S. 51 -511.

30. Maslennikov V.P. Cooperatives of Laos and their influence on the production of everyday goods // Cooperation of our days: experience, problems, prospects. M.: Publishing House of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples, 1992. P. 162 - 165.

31. Interethnic conflicts in the countries of the Foreign East. M.: Nauka, 1991.-276 p.

32. Small-scale production in the countries of the East (socio-economic and political aspects). M.: Nauka, Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 1992. - 200 p.

33. Mills Ch. Sociological imagination. - M.: Publishing House "Strategy", 1998. 262 p.

34. Mikheev Yu. 20 years of cooperation // New time.-1980,- No. 40.- p. 13.

35. Mikheev Yu.Ya. Laos on the path to building socialism. - M.: Knowledge, 1978. 40 p.

36. Mikheev Yu.Ya. The Lao People's Democratic Republic is 10 years old. - M.: Knowledge, 1985. - 64 p.

37. Morev A. Cereals and weeds on the confessional field // Asia and Africa today. 1999. - No. 3. - P. 67 - 74.

38. Moscow Oriental Studies. Essays, research, development.-M.: Publishing company “Eastern Literature” RAS, 1997. 544 p.

39. Population and society. Information bulletin of the Center for Demography and Human Ecology of the Institute of National Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. - M. - 1999. No. 38. - 6 p.

40. Population and society. Information bulletin of the Center for Demography and Human Ecology of the Institute of National Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences, M. - 2000. - No. 43. - 6 p.

41. Nezhmetdinova F.T. Political traditions of socialist society. Author's abstract. dis. Candidate of Philosophy Sci. Kazan. - 1987. - 19 p.

42. Nizamova L.R. Social differentiation in modern Russia: from class to post-class state // Social knowledge: formations and interpretations. Kazan, 1996. - P. 129 - 140.

43. Nugaev M.A., Nugaev P.A. Conceptual basis for the study of the Tatarstan model of socio-economic development. Kazan, 1997. - 200 p.

44. Nugaev M.A., Nugaev R.M. The problem of identity in the context of modernization of public life // Problems of cultural identity. Kazan, 1998. - P. 68 - 74.

45. Ogurtsov A.P. Typology // Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. M., 1983. - P. 685 - 686.

46. ​​Osipov Yu.M. Essays on the history of Laotian classical literature. St. Petersburg, 1991. 167 p.

47. Paderin V.K., Rakhmatullin E.S. Social identification during the period of transformation (for example Russian intelligentsia 1990s) // Problems of cultural identity. Kazan, 1998.-P.141 - 151.

48. Pankratova M. Rural residents of Russia. Fates and families in the 20th century. M.: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1995. - 60 p.

49. Plakhov V. D. Traditions and society. Experience of philosophical and sociological research. M.: Mysl, 1982. - 220 p.

50. Everyday life of the mid-90s through the eyes of St. Petersburg residents. - St. Petersburg: European House, 1999. 267 p.

51. Policy of renewal // Asia and Africa today. 1997. - No. 12. - p. 23 - 24.

52. The path to victory. Collection. M.: Politizdat, 1985. - 254 p.

53. Phammapanya Khamkhong. Human rights and freedoms in Laos // Human rights in the modern world. Legal, political science, sociological and philosophical aspects. All-Russian scientific conference (abstracts). Kazan: UNIPRESS, 1999. - P. 214220.

54. Rakhmatullin E.S. To know the society in which we live // ​​Scientific Tatarstan. 1996. - No. 3. - P. 49 - 54.

55. Sivertseva T.F. Eastern countries: fertility model. - M., 1997. -103 p.

56. Simonov V.V. Economic development of Laos (50-80s). - M.: Nauka, Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 1988. 214 p.

57. Skvortsov V. White elephants of luck. M.: Mysl, 1983. - 220 p.

58. Skvortsov V. Towers of Tatluang // New time. 1980. - No. 48.- P.24 -25.

59. Solovyova A. Laos. Priority programs // Asia and Africa today. 1998. - No. 12. - P. 18 - 22.

60. Social trajectory of reformed Russia. Novosibirsk: Science, Siberian Enterprise RAS, 1999. - 735 p.

61. Socio-economic development of the countries of Southeast Asia: lessons for Russia. M.: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1997. - 118 p.

62. Fates of people: Russia. XX century Biographies of families as an object of sociological research. M.: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1996. - 426 p.

63. Tatarova G.G. Methodology of data analysis in sociology (introduction). M.: Strategy Publishing House, 1998. - 223 p.

64. Traditional world South-East Asia. Small group and social dynamics. M.: Nauka, 1991. - 256 p.

65. Ulyakhin V.N. Scientific and technological progress: Asian version (shifts in social structure developing countries in Asia). M.: Nauka, Publishing company "Eastern Literature", 1992. - 174 p.

66. Urbanization in the countries of Asia and Africa // Asia and Africa today.-M.- 1998. No. 12.-S. 48-51.

67. Fatkhullin N.S. Small social group as a form of social development. Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House, 1989.173 p.

68. Phomvihan Cason. Selected articles and speeches. M.: Politizdat, 1986.-352 p.

69. Fursova V.V. Farming in modern Russia: problems and difficulties of formation // Tonus.- Scientific and journalistic almanac. 1998. -No. 4. - P. 145 - 151.

70. Shvedovsky F. In the footsteps of Buddha (notes of a Russian Buddhist monk) // Asia and Africa today. M. - 1998. - No. 12. - S. 73 - 76.

71. Shvyrev B.S. Historical and logical // Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. M., 1983. - P. 232 - 232.

72. Shpazhnikov G.A. Religions of Southeast Asian countries. Directory. M.: Science, Main Editorial Board of Oriental Literature, 1980.-245 p.

73. Srinivas M.N. A memorable village. - M.: Nauka, Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 1988. 360 p.

74. Sztompka P. Sociology of social changes. - M.: Aspect-press, 1996. 415 p.

75. Shchedrova A. Luang Prabang without princes and beggars // New time.-1980.-No. 45.-P. 24-26.

76. Engels F. Anti-Dühring // Marx K., Engels F. Works. T.20.- P.5 -343.

77. Engels F. Afterword to the work “On the Social Question in Russia” // Marx K., Engels F. Works. T.22. - P. 438 - 453.

78. Etiquette among the peoples of Southeast Asia. - St. Petersburg: Center for St. Petersburg Oriental Studies, 1999. 188 p.

79. Ethnography of childhood. Traditional forms of raising children and adolescents among the peoples of South and Southeast Asia. M.: Nauka, Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 1988. - 190 p.

80. Yadov V.A. Strategy of sociological research. Description, explanation, understanding of social reality. M.: Dobrosvet, 1998. - 596 p.

81. Yadov V.A. Strategy and methods of qualitative data analysis // Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical models. M.-1991.- No. 1. - P.14 - 31.

82. Yasaveev I.G. “Transition”, “modernization” or “transformation”: On the issue of the theoretical framework for research into the transformation of Russian society // Tonus. Scientific and journalistic almanac. - Kazan. - 1997. - P. 215 - 226.

83. Literature in Laotian language

84. Constitution of the Lao People's Democratic Republic. - Vientiane, 1992. - 32 p.

85. Law of the Lao PDR on labor, on insurance of companies, on the accounting activities of enterprises. Vientiane, 1991. - 107 p.

86. Law on Industrial Enterprises. Vientiane, 1997.- 61 p.

87. Law on the Promotion of Foreign Investment in the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Vientiane, 1994. - 17 p.

88. Law on registration of family and marriage. Vientiane, 1992. - 21 p.

89. Interview with the General Secretary of the NRPL Khamtay Siphandong // Party Construction. Vientiane. - 1996.- No. 13.-S.1-14.

90. Khamphai Saphangnya. New plan for economic and defense development in Laos // New morning dawn. - Vientiane. 1998. - No. 1-2. - P. 15-24.

91. Legacy of Lan Xang.- Vientiane: Institute cultural studies, Ministry of Information and Culture, 1996. 170 p.

92. Nyongsy Likhamsuk. Education as a means of eliminating outdated traditions and old beliefs // New morning dawn. - 1998. - No. 1-2. -WITH. 29-33.

93. The party calls for a new life // Party construction.-Vientiane. 1996. - No. 13. - P. 40 - 46.

94. Theory and politics. Vientiane, 1997. - 287 p. 136

95. Sources and literature in English

96. Report on Foreign investment in Lao PDR by Country. Vientiane, 1996. - 1 p.

97. Report on Foreign investment in Lao PDR by Sector. Vientiane, 1996. -lp.

98. BCEL and Commercial Development // Laos.- Vientiane.- 1995. No. 4.-P.14-16.

99. Economic Development in Champassak // Laos.- Vientiane. 1995. - No. 4.-P.18-20.

100. Kingdom of Laos: Khammanh Sipkanhsay. Sapouane Village // Laos.-Vientiane. 1995. - No. 4. - P. 28.

101. Kingdom of Laos: The land of the Million Elephants an of the nohite parasol. Limoges, 1995.

102. W on the promotion and management of Foreign investment in the Lao PDR. Vientiane, 1994. - 8 p.1.uth Saysana. Successful Businessman // Laos. Vientiane. - 1995. - No. 4. - P. 26 - 27.

103. Souvansay. Saysomboune: development is under way // Laos.-Vientiane. 1995. - No. 4. - P. 22-23.

104. Visit Laos Year 1999. Vientiane, 1999. - 62 p.

105. What and How To Do Business in the Lao PDR. A guide to trade and investment. Vientiane. - 1998. - 45 p.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). Therefore, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

Russian society over the past ten years has been characterized by a radical increase in inequality, changes in stratification, upward and downward personal and group mobility, and the formation of a middle class.

Years of reforms have shown that positive adaptation to the market socio-cultural system requires high quality human capital, a person prone to innovation, creative interpretation in the development of adaptive behavior patterns, emphasizing individual ways to achieve success. In the last few years, a certain correlation between the level of income and the level of education, especially higher education, has begun to appear. This is largely due to both the arrival of transnational corporations on the Russian market and the gradual transfer of management positions from the owners of industrial, mining enterprises, and trading companies to managers, specialists, that is, employees. This process especially accelerated after the 1998 crisis.

The value system of Russian society is undergoing a serious transformation. In the depths of the Soviet middle class, a system of values ​​was formed that, to a certain extent, differed from the official one. This partial value reorientation largely contributed to the post-Soviet adaptation to the explosive dynamics of the sociocultural system of that part of it that managed to move the farthest in the revaluation of values. The role in our lives has increased material assets: money and wealth, the importance of intangible values ​​has decreased.

The most important task that needs to be solved in the process of modernization transition to the new Russian socio-cultural system is a massive transition to internal control, i.e. self-control of the individual, his ability to make decisions and bear full responsibility for them, in contrast to external control characteristic of traditional society. Self-control, the willingness to introduce one’s behavior into a rational, legal framework is a necessary condition for the functioning of civil society. The formation of internal control is, apparently, the main task of modern Russian upbringing and education. Solving this problem will greatly reduce the intensity of various forms of deviant behavior.

The socio-cultural development of Russian society is largely determined by economic and political reasons. The main features of the socio-cultural development of Russia can be called increased social stratification and the formation of new population groups. As a result, social inequality has increased in the country, which is expressed not only in quantitative parameters. The new population groups that emerged (rich, middle classes, middle- and low-income) formed their own ways of life. At the same time, during the years of recovery, despite favorable average economic indicators, the differences between these structures continued to deepen.

In the cultural space of post-Soviet Russia, “mass culture” rules the roost. And with its help, reforms of the economy, political system, and social sphere are largely carried out.

Mass culture is “propaganda without a propagandist.” The values ​​preached by mass culture are presented as sanctified by the authority of public opinion as norms that a member of society must follow if he wants to live in harmony with other people, to be “no worse than others.”

Thus, this, firstly, shapes consumer psychology. Secondly, there is a narrowing of the sphere of personality, which leads to its peculiar standardization.

The higher education system has received fresh breath - being an educated person is again becoming both fashionable and profitable, education carries respect and weight in society. In recent years, so-called alternative education and distance learning, possible using modern computers and connecting to international information systems on the Internet, have become widespread.

Positive changes in the cultural life of Russia include the appearance of a large number of periodicals - newspapers and magazines - as well as a large selection of various literature. And in most cases, this is literature in almost all branches of knowledge, with good content and good printing.

After a period of almost complete collapse of the domestic film production and distribution system, when hundreds of cinemas were closed across the country, there has now been a certain rise in this area of ​​culture.

75. Globalization: ideas about the main theories.

In the very general view Globalization refers to numerous social processes of a planetary nature.

Paneconomic approach: development global economy is considered by its adherents as the main engine of globalization processes. Focus on increasing labor productivity, scientific and technical progress, strengthening democracy, improving the level of education, culture and health care as a consequence of the growth of the global economy. Key importance is attached to technological development that can smooth out traditional conflicts capitalist society and lead humanity to a new quality of life. The optimistic nature of the view of globalization through the prism of the pan-economic approach. The main adherents of the pan-economic approach (D. Bhagwati, B. Gates, etc.).

Culturological approach: the process of globalization is considered by representatives of this approach through the prism of intercultural interaction. Analysis of the nature of the course and consequences of the globalization of culture, including the erasure of socio-cultural boundaries, the destruction of cultural identity, intercultural conflicts, the formation of a new geopolitical configuration. Globalization is seen as new tool to pursue traditional goals of international power politics. A critical look at the achievements of globalization, a protest against the leveling of cultural diversity. The main adherents of the cultural approach (S. Huntington, A. Panarin, etc.).

System-theoretical approach: globalization is considered as a systemic transformation of society, accompanied by a weakening of traditional instruments of political governance and the formation of a power vacuum. As a result of globalization, a new social system is emerging, often leading to an exacerbation of social conflicts. The emphasis is on understanding the systemic risks generated by globalization, the structural and institutional effects of international communication, the new role of transnational corporations and intergovernmental organizations, and the consequences of dismantling the welfare state. The most representative approach that allows you to combine socio-economic analysis of social development with theoretical calculations philosophical nature. The main adherents of the system-theoretical approach (I. Wallerstein, W. Beck, E. Altvater, N. Luhmann, etc.).

Anti-globalist approach: globalization is perceived as a conspiracy of evil forces. These views are the result of a religious-metaphysical perception of reality, mystifying social processes. The thesis about the threat of the formation of a “global government” is put forward and means of combating it are proposed. Adherents of this approach can differ greatly in their theoretical, cultural and religious attitudes, as well as in their approaches to combating globalization. What they have in common is the rejection of globalization as a process, as well as the perception of this process as man-made, i.e. as a systematic implementation of the plans of hidden influential groups. The main adherents of the anti-globalist approach (G. P. Martin, H. Schumann, N. Chomsky, etc.).

Deliberativist approach: the process of globalization is viewed through the prism of the unification of legal and ethical ideas in different parts globe. Ethics and law are perceived as specific mechanisms of self-correction of global development, applicable on a worldwide scale. The task is to search for positive value foundations of society, shared by adherents of different political views, representing different cultures. Mechanisms for overcoming global problems generated by human development are proposed. Historical roots of the deliberativist approach in European philosophical thought (I. Kant, G. Grotius). The main adherents of the deliberativist approach (K.-O. Apel, J. Habermas). Methodology for studying globalization processes. Methods of socio-economic analysis. International statistics. Systemic functionalism. Regulatory methods. Socio-cultural analysis.

1. Socio-cultural features and problems of development of Russian society. Possible alternatives for its development in the future.

Russian society over the past ten years has been characterized by a radical increase in inequality, changes in stratification, upward and downward personal and group mobility, and the formation of a middle class.

In the last few years, a certain correlation between the level of income and the level of education, especially higher education, has begun to appear. New values ​​and goals are being introduced into the daily life of Russians, and new life practices and behavior patterns are being adopted.

Value system Russian society is also undergoing a serious transformation. In our lives, the role of material values ​​has increased: money and wealth, the importance of intangible values ​​has decreased

. The main features of the socio-cultural development of Russia - increased social stratification and the formation of new population groups. social inequality has increased. The new population groups that emerged (rich, middle classes, middle- and low-income) formed their own ways of life.

"Mass culture" is mainly built on the values ​​of money, selfish interest, and hence the corresponding influence that it has on mass consciousness. Such consciousness forms knowledge, ideas, norms, values ​​shared by one or another set of individuals, developed in the process of their communication with each other and joint perception of social information.

Positive changes in the cultural life of Russia include the appearance of a large number of periodicals, as well as a large selection of various literature.

The range of cultural endeavors is being enriched through the development of various kinds of public associations, movements, clubs, and associations. Cultural exchanges with other countries have become richer, and the feeling of cultural isolation is disappearing. New radio stations are being created. New orchestras are being organized, including symphony ones, and new theaters are opening. More and more films are being created that can already compete with Hollywood products and that are in demand by the audience. Domestic cinema continues to perform several main functions: informational, educational, critical.

Problems of development of the socio-cultural sphere of Russian society-a fall in demographic indicators, a deterioration in living standards against the backdrop of rising prices and declining wages, social vulnerability of the poor.

It can also be noted that in general, Russians' view of the future is becoming more optimistic compared to the last decade. People attach more importance not only to economic and political issues, but also to relationships, careers, and a healthy lifestyle.

Also, the socio-cultural development of Russia is influenced by terrorism, the role of oligarchs in the political and economic life of the country, the environmental situation, bureaucracy, the presence of extremist and fascist youth groups; the problem of modern national culture is the gap between the potential influence of culture on society and the actual ability of the masses to master it and use in everyday sociocultural practice. The dynamism of modern life has caused a significant complication in the structure and content of people's relationships with each other, with the natural and cultural environment. In addition, the possibilities for choosing forms and places for leisure, recreation, and satisfying intellectual and aesthetic interests have significantly expanded.

But the biggest problem of modern Russian culture is the confrontation between “folk” culture and “mass culture”. By the way, it has almost always been characteristic of Russia that true art is always the art of the past, not the present.

Prospects for the development of Russian society

For the socio-cultural development of Russian society as a whole, there is a favorable forecast, despite a number of existing problems. In the socio-cultural complex, the process of forming a system of state entrepreneurship is underway. The development of cultural organizations is largely related to the prospects for the development of cultural tourism, enterprises providing various shapes leisure For a modern Russian, the most significant socio-cultural values ​​are a good education, a prestigious job, a happy family, doing what you love, creativity, material wealth, reliable friends, honesty throughout life, spiritual, intellectual and physical self-improvement, acquiring new knowledge and travel. All this confirms the fact of the formation of the middle class in Russia in the course of socio-cultural development.

Currently, it is necessary to develop an effective state socio-cultural policy. The federal target programs in force today are poorly developed; they only indicate general priorities and directions of activity in the socio-cultural sphere, and are too abstract in nature and do not take into account the specifics of specific regions and territories.