Is Chatsky alone in comedy? Why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness: characterization of the hero


Using the image of the main character of the work “Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboedov wanted to show the reader how difficult it is to bring something new into the world, how difficult it is to live in a society where they cannot understand and accept you because of your progressive thinking. People with new views on life are always alien to society, and therefore are doomed to loneliness. This also applies to Chatsky, because it is not easy to find people who will share his views.

Chatsky is endowed with ideal features human soul. This person has self-esteem, he is educated and smart. Life in an unfair world is unacceptable to him. He tries in every possible way to resist the old order, telling people about new truths. IN " Famusov society“Chatsky is considered abnormal; people in Famus’s circle are not ready to accept his new views on life; it is much easier for them to continue living in their swamp with old morals and views. But Chatsky is doomed to loneliness in this vile Famus society.

Faced with lies, deception, hypocrisy and lack of education, Chatsky begins to directly express his opinion about the chaos that is happening around him. He opposes the “herd” opinion of the “Famus society.” Instead of understanding something, understanding something new, these people cling to the old order. They are simply afraid to leave the herd, so they express their misunderstanding and disgust towards Chatsky. People of the “Famus society” are ready to do anything for the sake of ranks and titles, hypocrisy and selfishness live in them, they don’t know any other life and don’t want to know.

Alexander Andreevich has a sense of self-expression, freedom, he will never serve, all this characterizes him as a man of new times. Chatsky is doomed to loneliness precisely because of this, he is very different from other people, he simply does not have an interlocutor in terms of intelligence.

Together with the article “Essay on the topic: Why is Chatsky doomed to loneliness? (“Woe from Wit”)” read:

The comedy work Woe from Wit is one of the most illustrative examples on the issue of generational change. The work, although through the prism of comedy, clearly and distinctly raises the issue of incompatibility between two generations, saying that the old must be replaced by the new. Raising the issue of generations in the work, we get acquainted with the generation of Chatsky and the generation of Famusov. Chatsky’s generation is people who are optimistic about progress and innovation in their lives, and the Famus generation is people who live in reclusion and conservatism.

Since the work is dominated by people like Famuskov’s society, the people of Chatsky’s society, and in particular Chatsky, have a very difficult time communicating, and simply being next to each other. Chatsky is desperately trying to convince Famusov’s society of their conservatism, however, having failed, Chatsky tries many more times, but never achieves his goal. Thus, the author showed us the problem of the old generation and the new generation, trying to teach everything through the prism of comedy and satire.

Due to complete misunderstanding on the part of others Chatsky arrives in splendid isolation, and most likely it will remain there. Chatsky is doomed to loneliness for a number of reasons, united in one word - misunderstanding. Chatsky, who is a new generation, simply cannot interact with the old generation, due to stereotypical thinking and an outdated philosophy of life. The old generation, which is the majority in the work, simply does not understand Chatsky, mistaking him for a crazy or very strange type. That is why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness until his generation becomes dominant.

With the help of comedy, which is the simplest literary way to convey an idea to the masses, it conveys to us the idea of ​​​​the collision of two centuries, thereby telling us to think more broadly and constantly develop, trying not to be from Famusov’s generation, that is, conservatives and not wanting change. I believe that the author well revealed all the characters in the work, which made us understand the essence of his message in it.

Option 2

This topic sounds scary, of course. Doomed means that he will always be alone, despite his desire to find someone.

Alexander Chatsky is in love with Sophia. He realized his love, which grew from childhood love for strong feeling. Alexander Andreevich was abroad for so long, he met, of course, many interesting women, but didn’t find the one among them. Sophia from a distance began to seem even sweeter to him, I think. When he returned, he saw how beautiful Sophia had become. So he fell in love!

“It’s barely light” he’s already flown to his beloved, but she’s been in love with someone else for a long time. The one, by the way, who doesn’t deserve her is Molchalin. And Chatsky cannot even imagine Sophia with this sycophant. In general, this strong feeling of Alexander Andreevich will not find a response from Sophia, she will even laugh at him, spreading the rumor that he is crazy. I think that he angered her with his truthfulness, and also because he saw “through and through” this bad Molchalin, who is already deceiving even Sophia.

But one failure is not a problem... Why is it doomed? It can be assumed that Chatsky will remain faithful to the image of Sophia and good memories. Maybe Chatsky is monogamous. It is possible that he is now so hurt by an unsuccessful romance (his first love) that he will not be able to look at other women. And marriage for “convenience,” like that of his suffering friend, whom Chatsky sees with his wife at the ball, is not for Alexander Andreevich. In general, Chatsky doesn’t care about the opinion of the world. I don’t care if somewhere they ever say that you, my friend, are not married, and this is not accepted... He will just laugh. Or marrying for position in society, career, wealth - not for him.

And we must not forget how Chatsky, excuse me, hates and despises everyone... He laughs at the cutesy ladies of the world. But simple woman(from the people!) also not for him - she would not understand this subtle soul.

Yes, and it’s not just about family! Loneliness also means the absence of friends, acquaintances... But here the situation is similar. Due to the fact that “you need to have acquaintances,” Chatsky would not communicate. And finding people “up to his level” is not so easy. He needs to be more tolerant. He sees the shortcomings of those around him, speaks about it openly, and this offends people. And he himself experiences so much negativity!

It turns out that if not for first love, not for calculation, then he does not need to get married. I think that Chatsky is not afraid of loneliness... And yet I want to believe that he will find a wise woman who could understand him and calm him down a little. Now he won't be alone anymore!

Why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness essay

In Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit,” everything socially was reflected as in a mirror - moral problems Russian society that time. Here the “past century” and the “present century” collide. The representative of new ideas exposing the vices of the Moscow nobility is Chatsky. Boldly and furiously criticizing Famusov's guests and friends, he becomes their enemy. The very title of the work partially contains the answer to why Chatsky remains alone in his aspirations.

Alexander Chatsky is an educated, thinking, witty and brave young nobleman. He is determined to resist the mores of lordly society. The meaning of these people’s lives is alien to him - wealth, high ranks, advantageous marriage, cheerful idleness. “Yesterday there was a ball, and tomorrow there will be two,” that’s all they do in Moscow, Chatsky notes indignantly. He does not accept their views on serving the Fatherland. He considers serving his superiors for the sake of a career a low and vile thing. Chatsky considers enlightenment a blessing for man, while his opponents dream of collecting all the books and “and burning them.” Famusov warns that reading books leads to “freethinking” and considers Alexander a dangerous person.

In his monologues, Chatsky boldly defends his civil position. He passionately criticizes his opponents, ridiculing their vulgarity and moral nonentity. Accustomed to their traditional way of life, they are indignant and do not understand Alexander. His speeches about enlightenment, about science, about the love of freedom are taken as the thoughts of a person who is “out of his mind.” Famus' circle spreads rumors about Chatsky's madness.

Not like everyone else, Chatsky is rejected by society. IN final scene he exclaims that it is difficult for someone “who breathes the same air with you” to come out unharmed and not lose his mind! It is better for him to run to where there is a corner for reason and feeling, away from these vicious people. The tragedy of Chatsky’s personality was predetermined. A person who decides to challenge the system remains alone. But this does not mean that his struggle was in vain, Russia was on the verge of change and, perhaps, Chatsky would join the “Decembrist” movement.

Also read:

Popular topics today

    What is history? In books and textbooks we can find a fairly short definition that says that history is the science of the past. History, most often written but sometimes spoken

  • Essay reasoning Separation

    Every person is always separated from someone or something, because man is limited. The first separation occurs at birth, when people are left without their cozy “home” and find themselves in the outside world.

A “social” comedy with a social clash between the “past century” and the “present century” is called the comedy of A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit". And it is structured in such a way that only Chatsky speaks about progressive ideas for transforming society, the desire for spirituality, and a new morality.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is a personality whom Griboedov awarded with such traits as independence, love of freedom, and generosity of soul. He has his own view of current events, a desire to fight injustice. The hero is literally imbued with love for the people and the desire to resist the cruel serfdom system that oppresses people. His feelings are sincere and spontaneous. This also applies to the purity of his love in Sophia.

In his work, the playwright created the “new man” of the era. He is not like everyone else, a “stranger,” a “renegade,” which means he is doomed to misunderstanding and loneliness.
The hero comes into the world with new ideas, thoughts, views. He condemns the morals that have become the basis of the life of the “Famus society”, taking root in the minds and hearts. Chatsky is a strong and courageous man, ready to fight for his principles and ideals.

But it turns out that his new views are not only unnecessary, but even harmful. After all, they disturb the peace of what is already established, turning into a cozy swamp. Chatsky is trying to change something, but it didn’t work out that way. He is invited to become like everyone else, to abandon his views. But for him, becoming a gray person in the same crowd is tantamount to moral death.

The comedy hero, who has made an unconditional decision to go against the system, remains completely alone. Moreover, Famus society does not forgive him for his independence and love of freedom, spreading a stupid rumor about his madness. It rejects the “madman,” expelling him from its world.

Chatsky's loneliness is explained by his incompatibility with the society around him. After all, the goals, values, and ideals are completely different for them. Representatives of the Famusov world cannot recognize Chatsky’s views as correct, because then they will need to abandon their cozy little world. And this is impossible for them.

So it turns out that, like any person who decides to go against the system, Chatsky has only one way out - the path of an outcast. Two completely different worlds can't be nearby.

    • The very name of the comedy "Woe from Wit" is significant. For educators, convinced of the omnipotence of knowledge, mind is a synonym for happiness. But the powers of the mind have faced serious tests in all eras. New advanced ideas are not always accepted by society, and the bearers of these ideas are often declared crazy. It is no coincidence that Griboedov also addresses the topic of the mind. His comedy is a story about progressive ideas and society's reaction to them. At first, the title of the play is “Woe to Wit,” which the writer later replaces with “Woe from Wit.” More […]
    • Hero Brief description Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov The surname “Famusov” comes from the Latin word “fama”, which means “rumor”: by this Griboedov wanted to emphasize that Famusov is afraid of rumors, public opinion, but on the other hand, there is a root in the root of the word “Famusov” from the Latin word "famosus" - a famous, well-known wealthy landowner and high official. He is a famous person among the Moscow nobility. A well-born nobleman: related to the nobleman Maxim Petrovich, closely acquainted […]
    • After reading A. S. Griboedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” and critics’ articles about this play, I also thought about: “What is he like, Chatsky”? The first impression of the hero is that he is perfect: smart, kind, cheerful, vulnerable, passionately in love, loyal, sensitive, knowing the answers to all questions. He rushes seven hundred miles to Moscow to meet Sophia after a three-year separation. But this opinion arose after the first reading. When in literature lessons we analyzed comedy and read the opinions of various critics about [...]
    • The title of any work is the key to its understanding, since it almost always contains an indication - direct or indirect - of the main idea underlying the creation, of a number of problems comprehended by the author. The title of A. S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” brings an unusual twist to the conflict of the play important category, namely the category of mind. The source of such a title, such an unusual name, which also originally sounded like “Woe to the Wit,” goes back to a Russian proverb in which the opposition between the smart and […]
    • The image of Chatsky caused numerous controversy in criticism. I. A. Goncharov considered the hero Griboyedov a “sincere and ardent figure” superior to Onegin and Pechorin. “...Chatsky is not only smarter than all other people, but also positively smart. His speech is full of intelligence and wit. He has a heart, and, moreover, he is impeccably honest,” the critic wrote. Apollo Grigoriev spoke about this image in approximately the same way, who considered Chatsky to be a real fighter, an honest, passionate and truthful person. Finally, I myself held a similar opinion [...]
    • Characteristics Present century Past century Attitude to wealth, to ranks “They found protection from court in friends, in kinship, building magnificent chambers where they indulge in feasts and extravagance, and where foreign clients from their past lives do not resurrect the meanest traits,” “And those whoever is higher, flattery, like weaving lace...” “Be inferior, but if you have enough, two thousand family souls, he is the groom” Attitude to service “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to be served”, “Uniform! one uniform! He is in their former life [...]
    • A. A. Chatsky A. S. Molchalin Character A straightforward, sincere young man. An ardent temperament often interferes with the hero and deprives him of impartial judgment. Secretive, cautious, helpful person. The main goal is a career, position in society. Position in society Poor Moscow nobleman. Receives a warm welcome in local society due to his origin and old connections. Provincial tradesman by origin. The rank of collegiate assessor by law gives him the right to nobility. In the light […]
    • The comedy by A. S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit” consists of a number of small episodes-phenomena. They are combined into larger ones, such as, for example, the description of a ball in Famusov’s house. Analyzing this stage episode, we consider it as one of the important stages in resolving the main dramatic conflict, which consists in the confrontation between the “present century” and the “past century”. Based on the principles of the writer’s attitude to the theater, it is worth noting that A. S. Griboyedov presented it in accordance with the traditions […]
    • In the comedy “Woe from Wit” A. S. Griboyedov portrayed noble Moscow of the 10-20s XIX century. In the society of that time, they worshiped uniform and rank and rejected books and enlightenment. A person was judged not by his personal qualities, but by the number of serf souls. Everyone sought to imitate Europe and worshiped foreign fashion, language and culture. The “past century”, presented vividly and fully in the work, is characterized by the power of women, their great influence on the formation of tastes and views of society. Moscow […]
    • CHATSKY is the hero of A.S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” (1824; in the first edition the spelling of the surname is Chadsky). The probable prototypes of the image are PYa.Chaadaev (1796-1856) and V.K-Kuchelbecker (1797-1846). The nature of the hero's actions, his statements and relationships with other comedy personalities provide extensive material for revealing the theme stated in the title. Alexander Andreevich Ch. is one of the first romantic heroes of Russian drama, and how romantic hero on the one hand, he categorically does not accept an inert environment, [...]
    • It’s rare, but it still happens in art that the creator of one “masterpiece” becomes a classic. This is exactly what happened with Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov. His the only comedy"Woe from Wit" became national treasure Russia. Phrases from the work are included in our daily life in the form of proverbs and sayings; We don’t even think about who published them; we say: “Just by chance, keep an eye on you” or: “Friend. Is it possible to choose // a nook further away for a walk?” And such catchphrases in comedy […]
    • The very name of the comedy is paradoxical: “Woe from Wit.” Initially, the comedy was called “Woe to Wit,” which Griboyedov later abandoned. To some extent, the title of the play is a “reversal” of the Russian proverb: “fools have happiness.” But is Chatsky surrounded by only fools? Look, are there so many fools in the play? Here Famusov remembers his uncle Maxim Petrovich: A serious look, an arrogant disposition. When you need to help yourself, And he bent over... ...Huh? what do you think? in our opinion - smart. And myself [...]
    • The famous Russian writer Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov said Great words about the work “Woe from Wit” - “Without Chatsky there would be no comedy, there would be a picture of morals.” And it seems to me that the writer is right about this. It is the image of the main character of Griboedov’s comedy, Alexander Sergeevich “Woe from Wit,” that determines the conflict of the entire narrative. People like Chatsky always turned out to be misunderstood by society, they brought progressive ideas and views to society, but conservative society didn’t understand […]
    • The comedy “Woe from Wit” was created in the early 20s. XIX century Main conflict, on which the comedy is based, is the confrontation between the “present century” and the “past century.” In the literature of that time, the classicism of the era of Catherine the Great still had power. But outdated canons limited the playwright’s freedom in describing real life, therefore Griboyedov, taking as a basis classic comedy, neglected (as necessary) some of the laws of its construction. Any classic work (drama) should […]
    • The great Woland said that manuscripts do not burn. Proof of this is the fate of Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov’s brilliant comedy “Woe from Wit” - one of the most controversial works in the history of Russian literature. A comedy with a political bent, continuing the traditions of such masters of satire as Krylov and Fonvizin, quickly became popular and served as a harbinger of the coming rise of Ostrovsky and Gorky. Although the comedy was written back in 1825, it was published only eight years later, having outlived its […]
    • The famous comedy by AS.Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" was created in the first quarter of the XIX centuries. Literary life This period was determined by clear signs of the crisis of the autocratic-serf system and the maturation of the ideas of noble revolutionism. There was a process of gradual transition from the ideas of classicism, with its predilection for " high genres, to romanticism and realism. One of prominent representatives and ancestors critical realism and became A.S. Griboedov. In his comedy "Woe from Wit", which successfully combines [...]
    • In the comedy "Woe from Wit" Sofya Pavlovna Famusova is the only character conceived and performed close to Chatsky. Griboedov wrote about her: “The girl herself is not stupid, she prefers a fool smart person...". Griboyedov abandoned farce and satire in depicting the character of Sophia. He presented to the reader female character great depth and strength. Sophia was “unlucky” in criticism for quite a long time. Even Pushkin considered the author’s image of Famusova a failure; “Sophia is sketched unclearly.” And only in 1878 Goncharov, in his article […]
    • Molchalin - character traits: desire for a career, hypocrisy, ability to curry favor, taciturnity, poverty of vocabulary. This is explained by his fear of expressing his judgment. He says mainly in short phrases and chooses words depending on who he is talking to. Not in the language foreign words and expressions. Molchalin chooses delicate words, adding a postive “-s”. To Famusov - respectfully, to Khlestova - flatteringly, insinuatingly, with Sophia - with special modesty, with Liza - he does not mince words. Especially […]
    • The gallery of human characters successfully noted in the comedy “Woe from Wit” is still relevant today. At the beginning of the play, the author introduces the reader to two young people who are completely opposite to each other: Chatsky and Molchalin. Both characters are presented to us in such a way that we get a misleading first impression of them. We judge Molchalin, Famusov’s secretary, from Sonya’s words, as “the enemy of insolence” and a person who is “ready to forget himself for others.” Molchalin first appears before the reader and Sonya, who is in love with him […]
    • When you see a rich house, a hospitable owner, elegant guests, you can’t help but admire them. I would like to know what these people are like, what they talk about, what they are interested in, what is close to them, what is alien. Then you feel how the first impression gives way to bewilderment, then to contempt for both the owner of the house, one of the Moscow “aces” Famusov, and his entourage. There are other noble families, from them came heroes of the War of 1812, Decembrists, great masters of culture (and if great people came from such houses as we see in comedy, then […]
  • Who at that time cared little about his spirituality, moral and ethical state. The main character of the work, Chatsky, is very brave. He pronounces all accusatory speeches out loud and immediately receives a response negative reaction. Therefore, the question arises: why does a society that is ossified in its rules not accept anything new, does not want to change and rebuild? Why is Chatsky doomed to loneliness? Will he really not have any support and approval? It is through the example of his hero that Griboedov shows how difficult it is to introduce new ideas into an established society, because they are immediately rejected and ridiculed.

    Why is Chatsky doomed to loneliness?

    It’s not that difficult to write an essay on the comedy “Woe from Wit,” because a lot can be said about the main character. Chatsky Alexander Andreevich has an independent and freedom-loving character, hence all his problems. He is ready to fight lies and injustice at any moment. He always has his own view of what is happening around him. Chatsky is a cultural and enlightened person. Griboyedov instilled in him the long-suffering Russian people, who were cruelly oppressed by the serfdom system.

    This is how the author saw man new era. So why is Chatsky doomed to loneliness? An essay on this topic should begin with the following: main character not like everyone else. He is a “hermit” and a “stranger,” which means he is doomed to misunderstanding, because he challenged a challenge that is mired in hypocrisy and deception, where a person is assessed only by his wealth, the number of serfs and his position. Strong and courageous Chatsky fought as best he could for his ideals and principles, but he was condemned and ridiculed, recognizing him as crazy. This is why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness.

    Be like everyone else

    He is invited to become the same as everyone else and forever abandon his ardent revolutionary speeches and thoughts. But he does not see himself in that gray crowd that is afraid to disturb its cozy swamp. For him, this is tantamount to death; his conscience simply will not agree to this. Expanding deeper into the topic “Why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness,” we must understand what is before us a real hero, who, without the support of like-minded people, decided to go against the whole system, which is why he is mistaken for a madman.

    No one can understand or appreciate such a “madman,” so all that awaits him, at best, is expulsion from society, and at worst, hard labor in Siberia. Such freethinking posed a threat to the autocratic regime, and the supreme rulers brutally dealt with the revolutionary-minded masses.

    Hermit

    Returning to the question of why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness, it should be noted that the forced recluse of the protagonist is due to incompatibility with the Famus society around him. These rich and capricious people from the social circle have completely different life priorities, values ​​and ideals. They will never be able to give up their benefits for the sake of someone; this is simply impossible for them.

    Therefore, Chatsky has only one path - a hermit and an outcast who dared to go against the existing system. Two different worlds, and there is no way for them to reconcile.

    IN human society the majority plays a huge role, it is almost impossible to resist the crowd, so the image of Chatsky, who took on the role of a warrior, but is still lonely, is tragic.

    In A.S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit,” out of 20 characters, only A.A. Chatsky is positive hero. He opposes the entire Famus society with his views, finding no understanding, he is forced to leave Moscow. What lies at the heart of the contradiction between Chatsky and Famus society?

    Firstly, this different look for education. Famusov believes that all evil lurks in science and education: “If we stop evil: / Take all the books and burn them.”

    Skalozub states: “I will make you happy: the general rumor / That there is a project for lyceums, schools, gymnasiums; / There they will only teach in our way: one, two; / And the books will be kept like this: for big occasions.” But Chatsky, on the contrary, sees education as a benefit for Russia, which is perhaps why he spent several years in Europe, gaining his “smarts.” Secondly, the heroes look at the way of life and its meaning differently. For Famusov, Skalozub and other representatives of “old Moscow”, service comes first. But by “service” they mean the ability to obtain the “golden key” (the title of chamberlain - the highest rank at court). For Famusov authoritative person is Maxim Petrovich, who was awarded the highest smile for his quick fall in front of the empress, after which a promotion followed. Skalozub, without taking part in a single battle, practically rose to the rank of general. It’s not for nothing that Lisa says about him: “And a golden bag, and aims to become a general.” But Chatsky “would be glad to serve,” but he “is sick of being served.” For he, just like Starodum from Fonvizin’s predecessor comedy “The Minor,” sees the meaning of his existence in serving the fatherland, and not individuals. But if they have some kind of opinion, then the rest, like Molchalin, generally believe that they do not have the right to judge such things: “At my age I should not dare / have my own judgment.” In addition, the severity of the problem lies in the fact that Famus society consists of people in whom there is even little human left, they have few moral qualities. Chatsky himself sees who is given preference in this world and says: “Silent people are blissful in the world.” And Famus society tries to expel people like Chatsky so that nothing interferes with a calm and familiar life. Yes, if a person lives guided only by personal benefits, knows how to remain silent at the right time, “pat a pug”, or raise a handkerchief - he is “one of his own”!

    Strengthens the tragedy of the image of Chatsky and love line plays. Sophia, being a smart girl, prefers Molchalin to Chatsky, the same Molchalin who managed to please everyone. And, of course, Alexander Andreevich cannot understand why she made such a choice: “Am I more stupid than Mochalina?” His love for Sophia is so great that he cannot even believe her words; he needs to see for himself. And he is convinced that Sophia, having been in Famus’s society for so long, has become the bearer of his traits. Sophia's coldness, her hostility towards him, and even the slander she launched caused swipe after Chatsky's heart.

    However, it is impossible to say that Chatsky is absolutely alone in comedy. After all, Skalozub says about his brother: “... he has firmly picked up some new rules. /The rank followed him; He suddenly left the service, / In the village he began to read books.” And Mrs. Khlestova talks about her nephew: “Professors!! - our relatives studied with them, / And left! at least now to the pharmacy, to become an apprentice./He runs away from women, and even from me!/Chinov doesn’t want to know! He is a chemist, he is a botanist, /Prince Fyodor, my nephew.” Despite the fact that these faces do not appear on stage, it still becomes clear that Chatsky is not at all alone in his aspirations.

    Thus, we see that rejection from society and the refusal of his beloved girl make the image of Chatsky tragically lonely, but capable of resisting in the war. The appearance of people of his type gives hope for an incipient change in public consciousness Russians of the 19th century

    Effective preparation for the Unified State Exam (all subjects) -