Essay on the topic “Comparative characteristics of Onegin and Pechorin. Comparative characteristics of Evgeny Onegin and Grigory Pechorin (Comparative analysis) Similarities of Eugene Onegin and Pechorin

Pechorin and Onegin belong to that social type of the twenties of the nineteenth century, who were called “superfluous” people. “Suffering egoists”, “clever uselessness” - this is how Belinsky figuratively and accurately defined the essence of this type.
So, how are the characters in Pushkin’s and Lermontov’s works similar and different?
First of all, the heroes of both novels appear before us as historically and socially determined human characters. The social and political life of Russia in the twenties of the nineteenth century - the strengthening of political reaction, the decline in the spiritual strength of the younger generation - gave birth to a special type of incomprehensible young man of that time.
Onegin and Pechorin are united by their origin, upbringing and education: both of them come from wealthy noble families. At the same time, both heroes do not accept many of the secular conventions and have a negative attitude towards external secular splendor, lies, and hypocrisy. This is evidenced, for example, by Pechorin’s extended monologue about his “colorless” youth, which “passed in a struggle with himself and the world.” As a result of this struggle, he “became a moral cripple,” quickly becoming fed up with “all the pleasures that money can get.” The same definition is quite applicable to Pushkin’s hero: “a child of fun and luxury,” he quickly got tired of the bustle of society, and “the Russian melancholy took possession of him little by little.”
The heroes are also united by spiritual loneliness among the secular “motley crowd.” “... My soul is spoiled by light, my imagination is restless, my heart is insatiable,” Pechorin bitterly notes in a conversation with Maxim Maksimych. The same is said about Onegin: “... the feelings in him cooled down early; he was tired of the noise of the world.”
This is where the idea of escapism arises in both works - the desire of both heroes for solitude, their attempt to distance themselves from society and worldly vanity. This is expressed both in a literal departure from civilization and in an escape from society into the world of internal experiences, “throwing off the burden of the conditions of light.” Onegin and Pechorin are also united by the common motif of “wandering without a goal,” “wanderlust” (Pechorin’s wanderings in the Caucasus, Onegin’s fruitless travels after the duel with Lensky).
Spiritual freedom, which is understood by the characters as independence from people and circumstances, is the main value in the worldview of both characters. So, for example, Pechorin explains his lack of friends by the fact that friendship always leads to the loss of personal freedom: “Of two friends, one is always the slave of the other.” The similarity between Onegin and Pechorin is also manifested in their identical attitude towards love and inability for deep affection:
“We’ve had time to tire of the betrayals;
I’m tired of friends and friendship.”
Such a worldview determines the special significance of the heroes’ actions in the lives of other people: both of them, in Pechorin’s different expressions, play the role of “axes in the hands of fate,” causing suffering to the people whom their fate encounters. Lensky dies in a duel, Tatyana suffers; similarly, Grushnitsky dies, Bela dies, kind Maxim Maksimych is offended, the smugglers’ way of life is destroyed, Mary and Vera are unhappy.
The heroes of Pushkin and Lermontov are almost equally likely to “assume a form”, “put on a mask”.
Another similarity between these heroes is that they embody the type of intellectual character who is characterized by originality of judgment, dissatisfaction with oneself, a penchant for irony - everything that is brilliantly defined by Pushkin as a “sharp, cooled mind.” In this regard, there is a direct overlap between Pushkin’s and Lermontov’s novels.
However, there are clear differences between the characters of these characters and the means of their artistic depiction in both novels.
So what's the difference? If Pechorin is characterized by a boundless need for freedom and a constant desire to “subordinate to his will what surrounds him,” “to arouse feelings of love, devotion and fear,” then Onegin does not strive for constant self-affirmation at the expense of other people, and takes a more passive position.
Pechorin's worldview is also distinguished by great cynicism and some disdain for people.
Onegin is characterized by mental apathy and indifference to the world around him. He is not capable of actively transforming reality and, “having lived without a goal, without work until the age of twenty-six, ... he did not know how to do anything,” “he was sick of persistent work.” This hero, unlike Pechorin, is less consistent in his principles.
So, with a comparative analysis of Pushkin’s and Lermontov’s works, one can identify both common and different in the images of these heroes and the methods of their artistic embodiment. Onegin and Pechorin are typical heroes of their time and at the same time universal human types. However, if Pushkin is more interested in the socio-historical aspect of the problem of the “superfluous man,” then Lermontov is concerned with the psychological and philosophical sides of this issue.
The artistic evolution of the “superfluous man” in Russian classical literature continues primarily in the images of Oblomov and Rudin in the novels of the same name by Goncharov and Turgenev, which reflect the historical changes of this human type.

(1 option)

"Eugene Onegin" and "Hero of Our Time" are the main milestones in the development of Russian literature of the 19th century. These are the best works of two true geniuses of Russia: A.S. Pushkin and M.Yu. Lermontov. The novels shock readers and literary scholars not only with the grandeur of their concept, but also with their innovation. It manifests itself primarily in the disclosure of the images of the two main characters. For the first time, Pushkin wrote a realistic novel in verse. It was akin to a revolution. The poet was worried about his creation, realizing that not all people would be able to

Appreciate a work that was ahead of its time. These worries were not unfounded. Even many of Pushkin’s friends could not understand the genius of the concept of the work.

M.Yu. Lermontov went even further in his creative quest. The novel he created was not realistic, like Pushkin’s, but combined the features of two movements. And this brilliant work was not appreciated by critics and contemporaries.

First of all, the innovation of the two novels lies in the characters that were new to the literature of that time. Subsequently, this type was called the “superfluous person.” This concept implies a romantic, then a realistic image of a young man, a nobleman, smart, educated and interesting, but far from real life, disappointed, inactive, alien to his contemporaries. The gallery of these characters opens with Onegin, followed by Pechorin.

The time of appearance of such characters is the 1830s, a period of decline. After the Decembrist uprising and the accession of Nicholas I, a cruel, reactionary politician, public life in Russia became quiet for a long time. A new social phenomenon appeared - young people who had everything except happiness and a sense of significance of their personality. Their sufferings and quests were embodied in novels about Onegin and Pechorin - heroes of their time.

Despite the apparent dissimilarity of the two works, their plot is constructed in the same way: the hero goes through some kind of test, his character is revealed depending on the situation.

Undoubtedly, the main test for both Onegin and Pechorin is the test of love.

Onegin, like Pechorin, at the beginning of the novel appears as a conqueror of other people's hearts, "a fickle admirer of charming actresses." He was not interested in deep feelings, he did not look for love for the rest of his life, to the death, but only cynically sought the adoration of pretty girls, and, having achieved it, quickly abandoned them, without thinking about the suffering caused. It was his cure for boredom.

How early could he be a hypocrite?

To harbor hope, to be jealous,

To dissuade, to make believe,

Seem gloomy, languish,

Be proud and obedient

Attentive or indifferent!

Onegin clearly succeeded in the “science of tender passion.”

So, Onegin is a playmaker. But then he meets Tatyana. He manages to easily win over this provincial young lady. She does not shine with beauty, and her soul is darkness for a carminative. And Evgeniy here simply plays the role of a mentor, teaching the girl how to live. But, having returned from the trip, having experienced a moral revolution and purification, he looks at Tatyana with different eyes. Onegin falls in love with her, completely loses his head, and not because Tatyana has changed (she remained the same in her soul), but because profound changes have affected Eugene himself, he has grown spiritually and has become worthy of Tatyana. But Onegin was late, she is married and will be “faithful to him forever.” And this is a clear illustration of the tragedy of the “superfluous man,” his “pathetic lot.”

Pechorin repeats the fate of Onegin. He also wanders aimlessly through life, trying to find himself; for some reason he also achieves the love of women, and then leaves them. Onegin sees that Tatyana has become his victim, but it is too late. Pechorin also could have prevented the tragedies of Bela and Mary, but did not want to. He also played with the fate of Vera, but she turned out to be stronger than him - and here he is, crushed and humiliated, crying about his lost happiness.

In the romantic "Hero of Our Time" there is no single female image. We recognize Tatyana's traits in Bel, Mary, and Vera. And thus, the hero’s love is more multifaceted and expressive.

The attitude of the heroes towards friendship is no less expressively described. Lermontov again lacks clarity; Lensky is embodied in Grushnitsky, Werner, and even Maxim Maksimych. However, a comparison between Lensky and Grushnitsky suggests itself. Pechorin and Grushnitsky also “have nothing to do, friends.” The storyline of a duel over a trifle, one’s infatuation with the other’s beloved, can also be traced in both works.

It is impossible not to mention the moral quest of Onegin and Pechorin, because both of them are involuntarily alien to the high society, the society to which they should belong. Onegin travels around Russia, Pechorin – around the Caucasus, both try to find the meaning and purpose of their existence in these travels. They trail women, make them suffer, fight in duels, ruin people's lives, without knowing why. As a result, their fate is unenviable.

Both Onegin and Pechorin are real “heroes of the times.” They are very similar to each other, and their tragedies are similar. There is no refuge for them in the whole world; they are destined to suffer and seek peace all their lives. Such is the fate of extra people.

(Option 2)

Probably, when starting his novel, Lermontov thought that his main character would remind readers of the existence of Pushkin’s Onegin. The undoubted similarity of the images of Eugene Onegin and Grigory Pechorin was one of the first to be noted by V. G. Belinsky. “Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora... Pechorin is the Onegin of our time,” the critic wrote.

The life span of the heroes is different. Onegin lived in the era of Decembrism, freethinking, and rebellion. Pechorin is a hero of the timeless era. What the great works of Pushkin and Lermontov have in common is the depiction of the spiritual crisis of the noble intelligentsia. The best representatives of this class turned out to be dissatisfied with life and removed from public activities. They had no choice but to waste their strength aimlessly, turning into “superfluous people.”

The formation of characters and the conditions of education of Onegin and Pechorin are, without a doubt, similar. These are people of the same circle. The similarity of the heroes is that both of them went from agreement with society and themselves to denial of light and deep dissatisfaction with life.

“But early the feelings in him cooled down,” Pushkin writes about Onegin, who “sick” with the “Russian blues.” Pechorin also very early “... despair was born, covered with courtesy and a good-natured smile.”

These were well-read and educated people, which placed them above other young people in their circle. Onegin's education and natural curiosity are revealed in his disputes with Lensky. One list of topics is worth it:

Tribes of past treaties,

The fruits of science, good and evil,

And age-old prejudices,

And the grave secrets are fatal,

Fate and life...

Evidence of Onegin’s high education is his extensive personal library. Pechorin said this about himself: “I began to read, study - I was tired of science too.” Possessing remarkable abilities and spiritual needs, both failed to realize themselves in life and squandered it on trifles.

In their youth, both heroes were carried away by a carefree social life, both succeeded in the “science of tender passion”, in the knowledge of “Russian young ladies”. Pechorin says about himself: “... when meeting a woman, I always unmistakably guessed whether she would love me... I never became a slave to the woman I loved, on the contrary, I always acquired invincible power over their will and heart... Is that why I never really did anything I treasure...” Neither the love of the beautiful Bela, nor the serious passion of the young Princess Mary could melt Pechorin’s coldness and rationality. It only brings misfortune to women.

The love of the inexperienced, naive Tatyana Larina also leaves Onegin indifferent at first. But later, our hero, upon meeting again with Tatyana, now a society lady and general’s wife, realizes what he has lost in the person of this extraordinary woman. Pechorin, it turns out, is not at all capable of great feeling. In his opinion, “love is satiated pride.”

Both Onegin and Pechorin value their freedom. Evgeniy writes in his letter to Tatyana:

Your hateful freedom

I didn't want to lose.

Pechorin directly states: “... twenty times I will put my life, even my honor, on the line, but I will not sell my freedom.”

The indifference to people inherent in both, disappointment and boredom affect their attitude towards friendship. Onegin is friends with Lensky "there is nothing to do." And Pechorin says: “... I am not capable of friendship: of two friends, one is always the slave of the other, although often neither of them admits this to himself; I cannot be a slave, and in this case commanding is tedious work, because it is necessary at the same time, to deceive..." And he demonstrates this in his cold attitude towards Maxim Maksimych. The words of the old staff captain sound helplessly: “I’ve always said that there is no use in those who forget old friends!..”

Both Onegin and Pechorin, disillusioned with the life around them, are critical of the empty and idle “secular mob.” But Onegin is afraid of public opinion, accepting Lensky’s challenge to a duel. Pechorin, shooting with Grushnitsky, takes revenge on society for unfulfilled hopes. Essentially, the same evil prank led the heroes to a duel. Onegin “swore to enrage Lensky and take proper revenge” for a boring evening at the Larins’. Pechorin says the following: “I lied, but I wanted to defeat him. I have an innate passion to contradict, my whole life was only a tribute to sad and unsuccessful contradictions of the heart or mind...”

The tragedy of the feeling of one’s own uselessness is deepened for both by the understanding of the uselessness of their lives. Pushkin exclaims about this bitterly:

But it's sad to think that it's in vain

We were given youth

That they cheated on her all the time,

That she deceived us

What are our best wishes?

What are our fresh dreams

Decayed in quick succession,

Like rotten leaves in autumn.

Lermontov’s hero seems to echo him: “My colorless youth passed in a struggle with myself and the light, my best qualities, fearing ridicule, I buried in the depths of my heart: they died there... Having learned well the light and springs of life, I became a moral cripple.”

Pushkin's words about Onegin, when

Having killed a friend in a duel,

Having lived without a goal, without work

Until twenty-six years old,

Languishing in idle leisure,

he “began wandering without a goal,” which can also be attributed to Pechorin, who also killed his former “friend,” and his life continued “without a goal, without work.” During the journey, Pechorin reflects: “Why did I live? For what purpose was I born?”

Feeling “immense forces in his soul,” but completely wasting them, Pechorin seeks death and finds it “from a random bullet on the roads of Persia.” Onegin, at twenty-six, was also “hopelessly tired of life.” He exclaims:

Why wasn't I pierced by a bullet?

Why am I not a frail old man?..

Comparing the description of the heroes' lives, one can be convinced that Pechorina is a more active person with demonic traits. “To be the cause of suffering and joy for someone, without having any positive right to do so, is not this the sweetest food of our pride?” - says Lermontov’s hero. As a person, Onegin remains a mystery to us. No wonder Pushkin characterizes him this way:

The eccentric is sad and dangerous,

The creation of hell or heaven,

This angel, this arrogant demon,

What is he? Is it really imitation?

An insignificant ghost?..

Both Onegin and Pechorin are selfish, but thinking and suffering heroes. Despising an idle secular existence, they do not find ways and opportunities to freely and creatively resist it. In the tragic outcomes of the individual destinies of Onegin and Pechorin, the tragedy of “superfluous people” comes through. The tragedy of the “superfluous man,” no matter what era he appears, is at the same time the tragedy of the society that gave birth to him.

Comparative characteristics of Onegin and Pechorin
What a short time separates Pushkin’s Onegin and Lermontov’s Pechorin! The first quarter and forties of the 19th century. And yet these are two different eras, separated by an unforgettable event for Russian history - the uprising

Decembrists. Pushkin and Lermontov managed to create works that reflected the spirit of these eras, works that touched upon the problems of the fate of the young noble intelligentsia, who did not know how to find use for their strengths.
Herzen called Pechorin “Onegin’s younger brother,” so what do these people have in common and how do they differ?
Onegin, before becoming a “young rake,” received a traditional upbringing and an extensive, but rather superficial education. Due to the fact that in the end he could express himself “perfectly” in French, dance the mazurka easily and “bow at ease,” “the world decided that he was smart and very nice.” However, quickly fed up with the fruitless bustle of social life, Onegin begins to be burdened by it, but finds nothing in return. Realizing the futility of the existence of secular people, Onegin begins to despise them, withdraws into himself, and indulges in the “Russian blues.” Living only by himself, without taking into account the feelings and experiences of other people, Onegin commits a whole series of unworthy acts. By the time he met him, Pushkin noted in Onegin “inimitable strangeness,” “a sharp, chilled mind,” “involuntary devotion to dreams,” an internal gap and misunderstanding between him and the people around him. Despite his deep contempt for the “world,” Onegin remains dependent on public opinion, and as a result kills his friend Lensky. Selfishness leads the “rake of the ardent” to severe spiritual drama and discord with oneself.
We don’t know much about Pechorin’s past, mainly from the pages of his own diary, from his conversations with other people. We learn that Pechorin’s “soul is spoiled by light”: “From childhood, everyone read on my face signs of bad qualities that were not there; but they were anticipated - and they were born.” Now those around him often do not understand either Pechorin’s thoughts or his actions, and he (and often quite justifiably) considers himself head and shoulders above those around him. Unlike Onegin, Pechorin does not shy away from people, does not avoid contact with them, but, on the contrary, becomes an extremely subtle psychologist, capable of understanding not only other people's actions and thoughts, but also feelings. Unfortunately, communication with him most often brings people and even himself only suffering and dissatisfaction. Unlike Onegin, Pechorin is not yet tired of life, he interferes in everything, is interested in many things, but he is not capable of truly loving and making friends. And if only Tatyana suffers from Pushkin’s love for Onegin (and later from Onegin’s love), then Pechorin brings misfortune to all the women he encounters: Bela, Vera, Princess Mary, even the smugglers’ friend.
Onegin's problem is his inability to make his life interesting, bright, and fill it with significant events. Pechorin is concerned about the question of the purpose of his own life, its meaning. The consciousness of lost opportunities constantly haunts him, since his belief in his “high purpose” does not find real confirmation. Both one and the other value their freedom, liberty, but it turns out that they too often sacrifice to it what is truly dear to them.
The differences in the destinies and characters of the heroes are explained by differences in eras: the life of Russia on the eve of the December uprising (Onegin) and the severe political reaction after the defeat of the Decembrists (Pechorin). Both Onegin and Pechorin belong to the type of “superfluous people,” that is, people for whom there was neither place nor work in the society around them. And yet, even despising their surroundings, Onegin and Pechorin were children of this society, that is, heroes of their time.

In life, things don't always work out the way we would like. We see this in the real world, this is what great books teach us. I liked the proposed topic because I really love A.S. Pushkin, and by reading the novel “Eugene Onegin”, you can study not only the poem, but also the history of the noble society of the 19th century.

The main characters of both works are young people. What did the young generation of that time dream of? Eugene Onegin, being a charming, handsome nobleman, received a “French” upbringing, however, the author emphasizes not strong abilities for mathematical sciences, foreign languages, but more for the “science of tender passion”, he lived the ordinary riotous life of the younger generation: he followed fashion, shone in balls, spent time in theaters in the company of rakes. But, in the end, all this “tinsel” of life bothers him, he becomes disappointed in both lives and people. In his soul there is emptiness, coldness, indifference. He is sick. And the name of this disease is “blues”.
Onegin begins to shun society, despises everyone, and is arrogant with everyone. This would have continued if not for the death of his uncle and his subsequent acquaintance with Lensky and the Larin family.

The Larins are wonderful, open, kind and simple people. Lensky is an educated man who studied in Germany, a romantic poet with high ideals and a romantic soul and capable of great love. The Larin family greeted Evgeny Onegin with parental care, as if they were a loved one. Little by little, his soul began to thaw, but overall he remained the same. But the tragedy of the work is when Tatyana Larina fell in love with Onegin, but was rejected and ridiculed by him.

Tatyana dreamed of finding a husband in Onegin, expects sublime love from him, having read French novels, immediately sees in him her dream of a romantic hero, but she was mistaken and, in the end, was forced to marry an “old man,” a rich man with a high rank. Lensky dreamed of a wedding with his beloved Olga, but dies in a stupid and senseless duel from a friend’s bullet.

Larina’s old people dream of a calm old age, of peace, of the happiness of their daughters, but reality contradicts their dreams. Eugene Onegin is forced to wander around different countries after a duel with Lensky, but life again brings a surprise: at the ball he meets a luxurious, secular lady, a trendsetter, who, among other things, is in the center of attention of the entire high society and shines with her beauty, manners, with his mind and recognizes Tatyana in her: “Is it really the same Tatyana?” He was amazed, his heart was pierced by love, he was sick with love!

Onegin dreamed of Tatyana, suffered, realized what a big mistake he had made by not appreciating her real merits: kindness, purity of soul, inner beauty. But Tatyana Larina is noble and honest, she cannot betray her husband, although she still loves Eugene Onegin. This work has been analyzed by thousands of critics from different countries, so it remains relevant today. Not only as a study of the high society of that time and the customs of Moscow, St. Petersburg, provincial Russia of those times, but also as the relationship between a man and a woman.

Thus, Onegin’s side appears here as an “extra person”, no one needs.

The same motif of the “superfluous man” is described in Lermontov’s work “Hero of Our Time,” where the inner world of the hero Pechorin, living in another generation, is similar to the world of Onegin in that he is also disappointed in life, gloomy, cynical, and strange.

Pechorin, just like Onegin, personifies an entire generation of his time, however, he includes such aspects of character as anger, envy, at the same time with generosity and kindness. The whole tragedy of Pechorin is that he cannot love, find an application for his strengths and talents, he would like to serve the Motherland, but Russia was in a state of reaction, any free thoughts were punished, and he rushed about in search of an application for himself. This unites him with Onegin, since he, too, could participate in the development of Russia, and not rush around in the bustle of life.

This is a potential hero who could bring a lot of benefit to society, but there was no need for this, and he wasted his energy on stupid, thoughtless, and also discrediting actions: a duel with Grushnitsky, his attitude towards Princess Mary and Bela. The tragedy of Pechorin, like the tragedy of Onegin, is the tragedy of many of their contemporaries, similar to them in their way of thinking and in their position in society. This is the tragedy of all progressive-minded nobles who entered life after the defeat of the Decembrists.

What a short time separates Pushkin’s Onegin and Lermontov’s Pechorin! The first quarter and forties of the 19th century. And yet these are two different eras, separated by an unforgettable event for Russian history - the Decembrist uprising.

Pushkin and Lermontov managed to create works that reflected the spirit of these eras, works that touched upon the problems of the fate of the young noble intelligentsia, who did not know how to find use for their strengths.

Herzen called Pechorin “Onegin’s younger brother,” so what do these people have in common and how do they differ?

Before becoming a “young rake,” he received a traditional upbringing and an extensive, but rather superficial education. Due to the fact that in the end he could express himself “perfectly” in French, dance the mazurka easily and “bow at ease,” “the world decided that he was smart and very nice.” However, quickly fed up with the fruitless bustle of social life, Onegin begins to be burdened by it, but finds nothing in return.

Realizing the futility of the existence of secular people, Onegin begins to despise them, withdraws into himself, and indulges in the “Russian blues.” Living only by himself, without taking into account the feelings and experiences of other people, Onegin commits a whole series of unworthy acts. By the time he met him, Pushkin noted in Onegin “inimitable strangeness,” “a sharp, chilled mind,” “involuntary devotion to dreams,” an internal gap and misunderstanding between him and the people around him. Despite his deep contempt for the “world,” Onegin remains dependent on public opinion, and as a result kills his friend Lensky.

Selfishness leads the “rake of the ardent” to severe spiritual drama and discord with oneself.

We don’t know much about Pechorin’s past, mainly from the pages of his own diary, from his conversations with other people. We learn that Pechorin’s “soul is spoiled by light”: “From childhood, everyone read on my face signs of bad qualities that were not there; but they were anticipated - and they were born.” Now those around him often do not understand either Pechorin’s thoughts or his actions, and he considers himself head and shoulders above those around him. Unlike Onegin, Pechorin does not shy away from people, does not avoid contact with them, but, on the contrary, becomes an extremely subtle psychologist, capable of understanding not only other people's actions and thoughts, but also feelings.

Unfortunately, communication with him most often brings people and even himself only suffering and dissatisfaction. Unlike Onegin, Pechorin is not yet tired of life, he interferes in everything, is interested in many things, but he is not capable of truly loving and making friends. And if only Tatyana suffers from Pushkin’s love for Onegin, then Pechorin brings misfortune to all the women he encounters: Bela, Vera, Princess Mary, even the smugglers’ friend.

Onegin's problem is his inability to make his life interesting, bright, and fill it with significant events. Pechorin is concerned about the question of the purpose of his own life, its meaning. The consciousness of lost opportunities constantly haunts him, since his belief in his “high purpose” does not find real confirmation.

Both one and the other value their freedom, liberty, but it turns out that they too often sacrifice to it what is truly dear to them.

The differences in the destinies and characters of the heroes are explained by differences in eras: life in Russia on the eve of the December uprising and the difficult political reaction after the defeat of the Decembrists. Both Onegin and Pechorin belong to the type of “superfluous people,” that is, people for whom there was neither place nor work in the society around them. And yet, even despising their surroundings, Onegin and Pechorin were children of this society, that is, heroes of their time.

(No Ratings Yet)

What a short time separates Pushkin’s Onegin and Lermontov’s Pechorin! The first quarter and forties of the 19th century. And yet these are two different eras, separated by an unforgettable event for Russian history - the Decembrist uprising. Pushkin and Lermontov managed to create works that reflected the spirit of these eras, works that touched upon the problems of the fate of the young noble intelligentsia, who were unable to find […]...
In the literature of every nation there are works whose heroes, positive or negative, a person remembers all his life, and there are characters who are erased from human memory over time. If we talk about Russian literature, the works of M. Yu. Lermontov “Hero of Our Time” and A. S. Pushkin “Eugene Onegin” are outstanding novels, the main characters of which are Grigory Pechorin and Eugene […]...
I look sadly at the naked generation! Its future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M.Yu. Lermontov Pushkin’s “Eugene Onegin” was for the poet, in his words, the fruit of “a mind of cold observations and a heart of sorrowful observations.” Belinsky in his article “Eugene Onegin” called […]...
I look sadly at our generation! Its future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M. Yu. Lermontov The novels by A. S. Pushkin “Eugene Onegin” and M. Yu. Lermontov “Hero of Our Time” show the dramatic fate of typical representatives of the noble intelligentsia of the first half of the 19th century. The main characters of these […]...
In the poetic introduction to the novel “Eugene Onegin,” Pushkin writes that his work is the fruit of “a mind of cold observations and a heart of sorrowful notes.” Belinsky in his article “Eugene Onegin” called this work “an encyclopedia of Russian life.” And in fact, in this novel, as in a magic crystal, the whole of Russian life was reflected: the high society, the small nobility, and [...]
Let's try to compare the images of two literary characters: Onegin and Pechorin. It is much easier to compare the characters of one work or, in extreme cases, a writer. But talking about the characters created by Pushkin and Lermontov is as difficult as it is interesting. These brilliant artists created images of heroes characteristic of their time. Onegin is a young man of the first quarter, and Pechorin is from the forties of the XIX […]...
V. G. Belinsky sees similarities between Onegin and Pechorin in many qualities. He directly states about Pechorin: “This is the Onegin of our time, the hero of our time. Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora” (Onega and Pechora are large northern rivers). However, he also finds differences that are quite significant, at least in […]...
The source of the development of society at all times has been people's dissatisfaction with their own lives and social foundations. On the threshold of the nineteenth century in Russia, among the progressive noble youth, dissatisfaction with the surrounding reality gradually began to be felt. Typical representatives of this circle are Eugene Onegin and Vladimir Lensky - the heroes of A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin”. The main common feature of Onegin and Lensky […]...
Tatyana is Pushkin’s favorite heroine in his novel “Eugene Onegin.” She is the ideal of a real Russian girl, and the poet’s ideas about the Russian national character are associated with her. Pushkin truly embodied in Tatyana the Russian woman of that time. She grew up in the village, and at the same time absorbed Russian customs, traditions and historical rituals, especially since she [...]
Russian classical literature is recognized throughout the world. It is rich in many artistic discoveries. One of these discoveries is the image of the “superfluous man”, “invented” by Russian writers of the 19th century. The most famous “superfluous people” in Russian literature were Eugene Onegin from A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” and Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin from M. Yu. Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time.” Eugene […]...
They got along. Wave and stone, Poems and prose, ice and fire are not so different from each other. A. S. Pushkin,”E. ABOUT." Pushkin is a great poet and writer of the 19th century. He enriched Russian literature with many wonderful works. Pushkin’s most important work was his novel “E. O.”Novel in verse “E. ABOUT." rightly considered “an encyclopedia of Russian life.” The author reflected in […]...
The images of Pechorin and Onegin are similar not only in semantic similarity. V. G. Belinsky noted the spiritual kinship of Onegin and Pechorin: “Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora... Pechorin is the Onegin of our time.” The novels “Eugene Onegin” and “Hero of Our Time” were written at different times, and the duration of these works is different. Evgeniy lived in […]...
I am writing to you - A. S. Pushkin Belinsky called A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” “the most sincere creation of the poet” - it sounds almost like an axiom, so correctly the critic defined the remarkable aspects of the novel in verse. There is no person in Russia who has not remembered at least a line from “Eugene Onegin”; the letters of Tatiana and Onegin are memorized, they are an example […]...
Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin is the greatest poet of all times. His brilliant works excited readers of many generations. But his poems are still young, interesting and relevant. The largest and most interesting work of Alexander Sergeevich is the novel “Eugene Onegin”. Belinsky called it “an encyclopedia of Russian life.” Indeed, the novel is multifaceted and gives an idea of life in Russia in the first quarter of the 19th century. But me […]...
EDUCATION Onegin: “The poor Frenchman, so as not to exhaust the child, taught him everything jokingly, did not bother him with strict morality” - he was educated simply, without much effort, but enough to enter society. “He could express himself perfectly in French and wrote.” “What do you want more? The world decided that he was smart and very nice.” “We all learned a little something, somehow.” […]...
Since the second half of the 19th century, primarily thanks to fiction, the concept of “an extra person” has come into use (this term was first used by A. S. Pushkin in one of his rough sketches for “Onegin”). A whole series of works of art appears, the heroes of which are united by the special status given to them in society - “superfluous people” who were critical of [...]
Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin is a complex collective image of the society of his time - the thirties of the nineteenth century. Pechorin is lonely and cannot find anything to do or do. He is bored because no secular entertainments occupy him. He does not succumb to the destructive influence of the light, but at the same time he imagines himself chosen for some great cause, without wasting his time on normal [...]
In Lermontov’s work “A Hero of Our Time,” or rather, in one of its parts, there are two heroes, one of whom is the most important, and exists throughout the entire novel. This person is Pechorin. Grigory Pechorin is a person who is not subject to anyone. No one was able to figure out this man, or understand him completely. After all, Pechorin – […]...
In the story “Princess Mary” Pechorin says about himself: “My whole life has been just a chain of sad and unsuccessful contradictions to my heart or mind,” “there are two people in me: one lives in the full sense of the word, the other thinks and judges him,” “alone they honor me worse, others better than I really do... Some will say: he was a kind fellow, others […]...
I. The first socio-psychological novel with a detective plot in Russian literature. II. A novel about the lost life of an extraordinary personality. Diagnosis and history of the “disease” of time and society. 1. The role of composition in revealing the “history of the human soul.” Everything is subordinated to one task - to explain the riddle of Pechorin: plot, plot, psychological portrait, confession as a means of self-characterization, the hero's diaries, the characters of different narrators, the author's prefaces. […]...
The poem “Eugene Onegin” talks about how important it is to make the right choice in a timely manner. Pushkin was able to describe with all realism the cruel joke of fate, when the roles of the heroes change exactly the opposite. At first, Tatyana was inflamed with passionate feelings for Evgeniy. The young girl saw in him the personification of the image of a long-awaited romantic hero. But Larina’s confession was rejected by Onegin. […]...
M. Yu. Lermontov’s novel “Hero of Our Time” (1837-1840) is the pinnacle of the writer’s creativity. This is a socio-psychological novel in which the author’s main task was to create an image of a contemporary person, to study the human soul. The author managed to trace how the environment influences the formation of personality, to give a portrait of the entire generation of young people of that time. In the preface to the novel, the main character is Pechorin […]...
Belinsky very accurately described Pechorin’s personality, calling him a hero of our time, a kind of Onegin. And they are so similar that the distance between the Pechora and Onega rivers is much greater than the difference in their characters. Herzen also agrees with Belinsky, who considers Pechorin to be Onegin’s younger brother. And if you think about it, it’s not hard to guess that they are really very close. Both heroes […]...
Pechorin Grushnitsky Origin An aristocrat by birth, Pechorin remains an aristocrat throughout the novel. Grushnitsky is from a simple family. An ordinary cadet, he is very ambitious, and by hook or by crook he strives to become one of the people. Appearance More than once Lermontov focuses attention on the external manifestations of Pechorin’s aristocracy, such as pallor, small brush, “dazzlingly clean linen.” At the same time, Pechorin is not fixated […]...
The novel “Hero of Our Time” became a continuation of the theme of “extra people”. This theme became central to the novel in verse by A. S. Pushkin “Eugene Onegin”. Herzen called Pechorin Onegin's younger brother. In the preface to the novel, the author shows his attitude towards his hero. Just like Pushkin in “Eugene Onegin” (“I am always glad to notice the difference [...]
Comparative characteristics are one of the most popular types of school essays today. Having studied Russian literature sufficiently and approached the final essay, we know that many heroes are, as it were, “pairs”: Chatsky and Sophia, Onegin and Tatyana, Onegin and Lensky, Pechorin and Grushnitsky, Oblomov and Stolz, Bazarov and Arkady Kirsanov, Prince Andrei and Pierre Bezukhov, Prince Myshkin […]...
In the Taman chapter we are shown Pechorin’s meeting with honest smugglers. Thanks to this incident, we can get to know Pechorin better. Firstly, we learned that Pechorin has his own prejudices about everything: “I have a strong prejudice against all blind people.” This may indicate that Pechorin is a fairly educated person. He can conduct deep discussions on various topics. Pechorin […]...
The hero of Pushkin's novel in verse, Eugene Onegin, appears before us at different periods of his Life. The entire first chapter is devoted to a description of his youth. Onegin's youth “Young rake” - these words can briefly describe Eugene at this time. He does not serve anywhere, leads a social life, attends balls and dinners, and pays a lot of attention to his appearance. He can […]...
“I look sadly at our generation...” M. Yu. Lermontov While studying Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time,” Belinsky noticed that Pechorin is in many ways reminiscent of Pushkin’s Onegin. This gave the critic reason to call Pechorin “younger brother” of Onegin. Emphasizing the undoubted similarity of the heroes of the two great poets, he said in his article “Hero of Our Time”: “Their difference is much less than the distance […]...
Onegin. The hero of the novel appears before the reader as both an ordinary person (similar to many others) and an extraordinary person, simple and complex. This complexity and even inconsistency were a reflection of that complex, contradictory era, which gave rise to such characters. At the beginning of the novel, we have before us a young man living according to the laws and customs of secular society. He leaves St. Petersburg not in a rush [...]
The originality of the beginning of the novel Origin, upbringing, education, pastime of Onegin. Characteristics of Onegin during the period of his fascination with light (a thoughtless attitude towards life, feigned disappointment, “the science of tender passion. Onegin’s indifference to art. Onegin’s day is a typical day for a young man. The reasons for Onegin’s disappointment in life and the interests of secular society. Traits of Onegin during the period of disappointment in the light : contempt for secular society. withdrawal [...]
Why does Pechorin belong to the type of “superfluous people”? Pechorin is a hero of the era of the 1830-1840s, when the facts of the defeat of the noble uprising of 1825 were fresh in the memory of the Russian people and when the “fathers”, the generation of the 20s, in a sense betrayed the ideals of the fighters for the triumph of freedom , equality and fraternity. And life already torments us, like a smooth path without a goal, Like [...]
... What is Onegin?. .. He is in the novel a man who was killed by upbringing and social life, to whom everything took a closer look, everything became boring... ...Pechorin is not like that. This person does not bear his suffering indifferently, not apathetically: he madly chases after life, looking for it everywhere; he bitterly accuses himself of his delusions... But as Pechorin’s Onegin is higher in artistic […]...
The main character is Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin, a young man of about twenty-five. In several places in the novel, the author gives a description of the hero’s appearance, indicating some of his character traits. For the first time in the novel, Pechorin appears in front of Maxim Maksimych in the fortress beyond the Terek (“Bela”): “He came to me in full uniform... He was so thin, white, he was wearing such a uniform [...]
“Hero of Our Time” by M. Yu. Lermontov was published as a separate edition in St. Petersburg in the spring of 1940. The novel has become one of the extraordinary phenomena in Russian literature. This book has been the subject of numerous debates and studies for over a century and a half, and has not lost any of its vital relevance even today. Belinsky wrote about it: “Here is a book that [...]
For me, M. Yu. Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time” is, first of all, a work about an insanely lonely man. Pechorin's life story consists of losses and disappointments: friends, acquaintances, and loved ones leave him. First of all, this happens because no one understands the hero. There is only one person who realizes what is going on in Pechorin’s soul. […]...
At the center of A. S. Pushkin’s poetic novel “Eugene Onegin” is the fate of a young nobleman, a typical representative of his time and his generation. Over the course of eight chapters, we observe his fate, the dramatic ups and downs of the hero’s life, his evolution. In the first chapter of the novel, Onegin is characterized “at the moment” of his appearance in the novel, the origins of the hero’s character are revealed - the conditions of his […]...
The reader gets acquainted with Pechorin in the story “Bela”. Maxim Maksimych, a staff captain who served with him in the Caucasus, and is sincerely attached to Pechorin, talks about him. Maxim Maksimych is a kind person; The tragedy of love, Pechorin's disappointment touches the captain's heart. He admires the hero, but cannot understand Pechorin: for him he is “a nice fellow,” “but with great oddities.” Maxim Maksimych and [...]
The entire life of the main character of M. Yu. Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time” can indeed be called a tragedy. Why and who is to blame for this are the topics that this essay is devoted to. So, Grigory Pechorin was expelled from St. Petersburg for a certain “story” to the Caucasus, several more stories happened to him along the way, he was demoted, again sent to the Caucasus, then for some time […]...
Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin is the greatest Russian realist poet. His best work, in which “his whole life, all his soul, all his love; his feelings, concepts, ideals” is “Eugene Onegin”. A.S. Pushkin in his novel “Eugene Onegin” asks and tries to answer the question: what is the meaning of life? He sets out to give a realistic portrayal of a young man in secular society. IN […]...

Comparative characteristics of Onegin and Pechorin

Essay on the topic “Comparative characteristics of Onegin and Pechorin. Comparative characteristics of Evgeny Onegin and Grigory Pechorin (Comparative analysis) Similarities of Eugene Onegin and Pechorin

Related posts: