Why is Malakhov being removed from Channel 1? Malakhov was fired from Channel One: why

Why Malakhov was fired from Channel One is a question that has been heard in the public for several weeks. For a long time there was no worthy answer to this question. But just recently, all the dots were connected, and the whole truth came out.

Andrey and his successes at First

It should be canceled that the famous TV presenter gave Channel One a significant part of his life. The man worked there since 1992, and managed to gain wide popularity, and most importantly, the love of millions of people.

His show “Let Them Talk” has existed for about 10 years, during which it was able to reach the top, winning high ratings. So why Malakhov was fired remained a mystery to many. Moreover, the TV channel and Andrey himself did not comment on this for a long time.

Malakhov was fired from Channel One: reasons

Recently, new information appeared in the media about why Malakhov was fired. As the BBC reported, the man is leaving for VGTRK due to his conflict with the management of the former. Recently, it was decided to slightly change the format of the well-known program. Instead of discussing social and everyday problems, take up politics. But the guy didn’t like this decision. He wanted to create the program plan himself, and not receive clear decrees. He got a little bored with the role of presenter and wanted something more.

Another reason why Malakhov was fired was the return of Natalya Nikonova. As many people know, the woman previously worked on the show, but left, becoming the producer of the program in Russia. Her next debut at the first seriously hit a man who does not intend to tolerate such antics. How can a competitor come calmly from another channel and set his own rules? The girl definitely came to shake up the socio-political bloc, especially since the presidential elections are approaching, which she still has plans for.

Before they had time to finally confirm the information for what reason the first channel fired Malakhov, they began to look for a replacement in his place. The “feeding trough” was empty for long. At the audition they saw Dmitry Borisov and Dmitry Shepelev, the latter received the role of presenter.

Why Malakhov was fired from the channel became serious news, which the TV presenter himself finally commented on in one of the newspapers. The man said that he had always been just a pawn in the hands of his superiors, who constantly expressed their demands.

“I have always been subservient. A human soldier who follows orders,” Malakhov spoke after a long silence. He stated that he wanted career growth and wanted to open his own program, as many of his colleagues had done.

We must not forget about money. When wondering why Malakhov was fired from the first, it should be understood that his competitors offered him a higher salary, and this has always been a weighty argument. Moreover, the future father seriously needs additional funds.

Not only the media, but also medicine sellers decided to profit from the departure of the famous TV presenter.

Our journalists brought the speculators to the surface.

Headlines with a flashy title appeared on the Internet: “Exclusive: how the scandal between Ernst and Malakhov ended, and where to buy the sensational joint treatment for 1 ruble”; “The truth about Malakhov and the secret he revealed of restoring damaged joints, which cost the TV presenter his career.”
Further in the text we can see how the showman himself Andrei Malakhov and the head of Channel One Konstantin Ernst enter into a dialogue with Vladimir Solovyov.

To begin with, we will present the text of the fake article verbatim, so that it is clear what we are talking about.

Soloviev: Are you ready for a bomb to explode? The scandal surrounding joint products for 1 ruble has reached its climax! Let's figure out who is right and who is the pharmacy mafia! Confrontation between Malakhov and Ernst. Right now, exclusive interview on knives!
TO THE BARRIER!

Malakhov: I WAS KICKED OUT! I WANTED TO TELL THE TRUTH! This cheap joint remedy changes everything!

Ernst: I'm not selfish! But the channel needs money. Who are you, Andrey, to judge? I am the power here!

Soloviev: In the studio there is shouting, waving fists, swearing. Channel 1 mastodons are hysterical! Turn off their microphones temporarily!!

Let's remember where it all started: Andrey made a program about disabled people who suffered from diseased joints because they were treated with expensive but ineffective means. Andrey told the world about the existence of an affordable remedy that treats arthritis, arthrosis, rheumatism and other diseases ONCE and FOR ALL.

Ernst was furious that Andrei did not agree with him on the topic of the program. As punishment, Kostya not only did not air the program, he fired Andrei, throwing him out into the street like a puppy.

Friends! The main question is what’s wrong with the joints, why is the whole country sick, why does everyone after 40 begin to experience pain in the lower back, arms, legs, swelling, and cramps. Women and men suffer; it is difficult for them to walk and bend over. And how does it all end? Cancer.

Andrey, tell us what happened in the country BEFORE the release of the ill-fated program?

Malakhov: I consider that broadcast not ill-fated, but on the contrary, the main thing in my career! I have finally told the truth that will change the lives of millions for the better!

Yes, I had to sacrifice my work. Yes, talk about Ernst’s connections with the pharmacy mafia. Advertising for joint pain remedies on Channel One was carried out by the pharmacy mafia. These people living in Europe and America profited from Russian pensioners. Our scientists knew that a remedy from a NEW GENERATION had already been invented and tested and HELPS SICK JOINTS. But who will listen to our scientists? These are people driven into a corner with meager wages and no right to vote! The pharmacy mafia hid as best they could the existence of the BEST REMEDY, because it is more profitable to sell temporary relief, not a panacea!

Ernst: YOU ARE A FUCKING EGOIST, ANDRYUSHA! THINKING ONLY ABOUT HIS OWN SKIN AND CHEAP POPULARITY! The topic of this issue was not agreed upon with me. You knew I would say no. While I'm here as a director, I want my employees to comply and not go AWOL.

I have nothing against people with disabilities, but I can’t advertise a cheap drug to the whole country for free. Channel One, like other channels, lives off advertising. These are billions of rubles. Do you know how much 1 minute of advertising costs in “Let Them Talk”?

Andrey knows. He also knows that I pay all Ostankino employees from this advertisement. And still he helped with charity. Yes it's true. The channel does not advertise the most effective products for joints, but you understand me, I’m not thinking about myself, but about 2,443 employees and their families.

Soloviev: Who is the egoist here still needs to be figured out.
Andrey, God bless him with television, how is it that such a drug is not allowed in Russian pharmacies and hospitals?

Malakhov: I asked the same question to Viktor Sedelnikov, the chief rheumatologist of Russia. The answer shocked me!

Soloviev: Display a video excerpt from a FORBIDDEN BROADCAST!

Victor Sedelnikov: The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not engaged in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price of 1 ruble, as part of a special program.

Despite my high position, I have no influence on commercial pharmacy chains. All I can do is recommend the drug. I wholeheartedly recommend Flex-Pro to everyone. Actually, the entire scientific community understands what a colossal breakthrough has been made in the field of joint treatment. To my deep regret, pharmacy chains did not react.

As for hospitals and clinics: we are now working on the issue of distributing Flex-Pro, which is associated with bureaucratic delays, but I hope that within the next 10-12 months the issue will be resolved.

Malakhov: What should people do until the drug becomes available to doctors?

Victor Sedelnikov: We found a way out of the situation - the research institute's specialists created a special website on their own where you can leave a request for Flex-Pro and get it for 1 ruble. All you need to do is simply leave your name and contact information. After this, you will be contacted to confirm a convenient delivery time. We tried to make everything as simple as possible so that everyone could get their medicine, even if they had never ordered anything online before.

I want to draw the attention of readers that diseases of the back and joints are “getting younger”, and even mild periodic pain is a reason to pay attention to the problem. Don't wait until bone marrow or blood cancer appears and you'll just wait to die.

LEAVE A REQUEST AND RECEIVE "Flex-Pro" FOR 1 RUBLE!

Soloviev: Konstantin, now the whole country has certainly learned about a remedy that will help joints once and for all. What do you think the advertisers producing expensive products whose ads you watch every day will do?

Ernst: They'll just turn around and leave! I will not forgive Andrey for his betrayal. I think I did the right thing. I don’t think sore joints are that scary. There are more serious diseases.

Malakhov: If you, Kostya, had bothered to watch the program that you slaughtered like a sacrificial ram on the altar, you wouldn’t have said that!!!

Soloviev: Turn on an excerpt from a program slaughtered like a ram, where they talk about joints and the serious consequences of the disease. I didn't understand something about cancer.

At the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, we have created the first medicine of its kind that can truly restore joints.

Our journalist decided to find out whether this drug really costs 1 ruble. Having left a request on the recommended website, the manager immediately called back within 10 minutes (I would like to note that it was a Sunday afternoon, the time was 20:30). It is very doubtful that the employees of the research institute sit on the telephone line around the clock to sell you a “miracle” drug for 1 ruble.

As it turned out, the first basic course consists of 180 tablets (these are 2 packages of 90 capsules), which are enough for one and a half months. This basic course costs 3,961 rubles, but in addition you can purchase another 30 capsules for just 1 ruble, but again, this is a promotion.

I would like to draw your attention to how these typical one-page websites for selling goods are designed: at first glance they look like information media, but when you click on thematic “sections”, you are automatically redirected to the order page. Many domain names have typical names for online stores http://krasota-zdorovie.com, http://myotzyvyrus.ru and others more impressive - http://blogstarnews.org, http://news4russian.ru

Other one-page websites for selling goods decided to exploit the pharmacy mafia and human greed. Thus, a material was released that described in detail how Andrei Malakhov was tested on a polygraph in the “Actually” program with Shepelev. From the text we understand that Malakhov is telling the truth about an unknown drug because of which Ernst kicked him out and did not allow the last episode of “Let Them Talk” to air. However, another reasonable question arises here: “How then did Erns allow the release of the program “Actually” with the participation of Malakhov, since it is also broadcast on Channel One?” But no way! After all, this release did not exist at all, you will not find this video anywhere.

Taking advantage of the gullibility of citizens and their despair, entrepreneurs decided to quickly hit the jackpot on the sensational intrigue. According to the manager, interest in the Flex-Pro drug has recently increased significantly after the “truth” was revealed to the public, so you should hurry up with your orders, since there is only a small batch left.

We can only hope that the proposed “miracle” pills are really effective, and this is just a lie to save the sick!

Malakhov's departure from Channel One

Malakhov himself explained his departure from Channel One by his desire to make decisions. Andrei Malakhov said that his departure from Channel One was due to the desire to change his status from a “lead in the ear” to a person who makes his own decisions. He also published a farewell letter to his colleagues from the channel.

“I want to grow, to become a producer, a person who makes decisions, including determining what my program should be about, and not giving up my whole life and looking like a puppy into the eyes of people changing during this time. The TV season ended, I decided that I needed to close this door and try myself in a new capacity in a new place,” Malakhov said.

When asked about the reasons for the conflict with Channel One producer Natalya Nikonova, the presenter did not answer. “Can I leave this without comment? I have always believed that one must be consistent in love and dislike. It’s unusual for me to change my set of beliefs as if by magic. “I’ll end the story here,” he said.

Malakhov published an open letter to the general director of Channel One on the StarHit portal, of which he is the editor-in-chief.
“Dear Konstantin Lvovich! 45 years is an important milestone in a man’s life, 25 of them I gave to you and Channel One. These years became part of my DNA, and I remember every minute that you dedicated to me. Thank you very much for everything you did , for the experience that was passed on to me, for the amazing journey along the television road of life that we went through together,” the presenter wrote.

In his address, Malakhov noted that he had seen fragments of the show “Let Them Talk” with the new presenter Dmitry Borisov.
“Dima, all my hope is in you! The other day I saw fragments of “Let Them Talk” with your participation. I’m sure you will succeed!” - the TV presenter admonished.

The famous presenter Andrei Malakhov had a conflict with the management of Channel One. The disagreements turned out to be so significant that the TV presenter filed an application and decided to change the channel.

While viewers were wondering why the producers removed Andrei Malakhov from Channel 1, the media, citing anonymous sources, published several versions:

1. Conflicts within the team.
2. Decline in TV ratings.
3. The discrepancy between the views of Malakhov and Natalya Nikonova (producer) on the topic of the program.
4. The producers' reluctance to grant the presenter maternity leave (the showman's wife is about to give birth).

On the First, they filmed an episode of the show about the departure of the star presenter. The media reported that there are a couple of candidates for Malakhov’s place - Borisov and Shepelev. As a result, the issue about Malakhov was hosted by Dmitry Borisov.

It’s no secret that working effectively and making a quality product for broadcast in conditions of intra-team hostility and discontent is problematic.

The presenter himself noted that a lot has changed over the course of several years. He was not pleased with the change in the location of the program’s filming (previously, episodes of the show were filmed at the Ostankino television center) and he was tired of following management’s commands, without being able to influence the theme and the filming process.

Film crew of the program “Let Them Talk”

Discontent reached its peak in mid-summer 2017. Although at the beginning of the summer, in an interview with GQ, the presenter stated that the reason could only be a proposal to do something completely absurd and immoral on air to increase ratings.

Malakhov was fired - the main reasons

The TV presenter himself denied the theory about the insufficient amount of the fee and said that if this were the only issue, he would have left Channel 1 several years ago.

Theoretically, the reason for the decline in ratings could be a sharp shift in topics towards politics. The “Let Them Talk” program is an analogue of the popular American show for housewives (“The Jerry Springer Show”). Considering such an audience, it is not surprising that the departure from social and everyday themes did not create a sensation.

Malakhov VS Nikonova

One of the most plausible reasons for the presenter’s departure from the channel is the conflict between Malakhov and the new producer of Channel One, Natalya Nikonova.

During the pre-election race, Mrs. Nikonova began broadcasting “Let Them Talk” programs with explicitly political themes. Malakhov did not agree with this decision and expressed his dissatisfaction, but the channel’s management refused to meet the showman and give him the opportunity to choose topics for the programs himself.

Malakhov is no longer the host of the “Let Them Talk” program

Speaking about the real reasons for leaving, the presenter noted that he had long become popular with the audience and over the years of work he was tired of blindly following instructions at a time when less experienced and well-known presenters get the opportunity to work on their own projects.

For a creative person with such colossal experience in hosting television programs behind him, such an attitude from management is a serious reason to think about leaving for a place where his initiative and experience will be appreciated and his opinions will be listened to.

This is not the first case on television when producers do not take into account the presenters, do not try to compromise and lose talented channel employees. It is unknown what the change in the host of “Let Them Talk” will mean for the program’s ratings.

The change in the theme of the show caused dissatisfaction not only with Malakhov, but also with some other team members. Producer Natalya Nikonova previously worked on the “Live Broadcast” program on Russia 1 channel, and the ratings of this program, due to its seriousness and obvious political bias, were significantly lower than those of “Let Them Talk.”

Andrey works as a presenter of the “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya channel.

There was no open conflict, but the whole team was perplexed and tense; no one wanted to turn the popular talk show into a clone of “Live Broadcast.”

There were even rumors that this was the real reason for the departure of not only Malakhov. There was an assumption in the press that the presenter would take 1 part of the team with him to the Russia channel. An anonymous source denied this information, saying that there have been no statements of resignation from anyone from the team working on the “Let Them Talk” program.

Family is the most important thing

The showman's wife Natalya Shkuleva, who holds the position of publisher and brand director of Elle magazine in the Russian Federation, is in a position and soon a new addition to the TV presenter's family is expected. In this regard, the real reason for Malakhov’s departure from the channel, according to Elle, was the refusal of the show’s producer, Natalya Nikonova, to grant the TV presenter leave to help his wife care for the baby.

Moreover, it became known that Mrs. Nikonova denied the presenter the legal right (Labor Code of the Russian Federation, Article 256) to take maternity leave in a rather rude manner, stating that working on the show is not a kindergarten and Malakhov must decide who he is first of all - nanny or TV presenter.

The showman was dissatisfied with this attitude of management and cynicism towards him. Considering his many years of work on the First, his experience and popularity with the audience, the producers could have been more loyal and polite.

A quarter of a century is no joke

The talented TV presenter began working on Channel One about 25 years ago, and since 2001 he was approved as the host of the show “Big Wash,” which was later renamed “5 Evenings,” and then became the well-known program “Let Them Talk.”

The presenter himself said that over many years of cooperation, everyone was so accustomed to him always being on Channel One that since December 2016 they even forgot to renew the contract with him, although Malakhov continued to work and host the show.

The “Let Them Talk” program is hosted by Dmitry Borisov

Considering how many years Malakhov hosted the show on Channel One and how many fans he acquired during this time, we can safely say that viewers will watch his programs on any channel.

Ecuadorian authorities have denied Julian Assange asylum at the London embassy. The founder of WikiLeaks was detained by British police, and this has already been called the biggest betrayal in the history of Ecuador. Why are they taking revenge on Assange and what awaits him?

Australian programmer and journalist Julian Assange became widely known after the website WikiLeaks, which he founded, published secret documents from the US State Department in 2010, as well as materials related to military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But it was quite difficult to find out who the police, supporting by the arms, were leading out of the building. Assange had grown a beard and looked nothing like the energetic man he had previously appeared in photographs.

According to Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno, Assange was denied asylum due to his repeated violations of international conventions.

He is expected to remain in custody at a central London police station until he appears at Westminster Magistrates' Court.

Why is the President of Ecuador accused of treason?

Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa called the current government's decision the biggest betrayal in the country's history. “What he (Moreno - editor’s note) did is a crime that humanity will never forget,” Correa said.

London, on the contrary, thanked Moreno. The British Foreign Office believes that justice has triumphed. The representative of the Russian diplomatic department, Maria Zakharova, has a different opinion. “The hand of “democracy” is squeezing the throat of freedom,” she noted. The Kremlin expressed hope that the rights of the arrested person will be respected.

Ecuador sheltered Assange because the former president had left-of-center views, criticized U.S. policies and welcomed WikiLeaks' release of secret documents about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even before the Internet activist needed asylum, he managed to personally meet Correa: he interviewed him for the Russia Today channel.

However, in 2017, the government in Ecuador changed, and the country set a course towards rapprochement with the United States. The new president called Assange “a stone in his shoe” and immediately made it clear that his stay on the embassy premises would not be prolonged.

According to Correa, the moment of truth came at the end of June last year, when US Vice President Michael Pence arrived in Ecuador for a visit. Then everything was decided. “You have no doubt: Lenin is simply a hypocrite. He has already agreed with the Americans on the fate of Assange. And now he is trying to make us swallow the pill, saying that Ecuador is supposedly continuing the dialogue,” Correa said in an interview with the Russia Today channel.

How Assange made new enemies

The day before his arrest, WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Kristin Hrafnsson said that Assange was under total surveillance. “WikiLeaks uncovered a large-scale espionage operation against Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy,” he noted. According to him, cameras and voice recorders were placed around Assange, and the information received was transferred to the Donald Trump administration.

Hrafnsson clarified that Assange was going to be expelled from the embassy a week earlier. This did not happen only because WikiLeaks released this information. A high-ranking source told the portal about the plans of the Ecuadorian authorities, but the head of the Ecuadorian Foreign Ministry, Jose Valencia, denied the rumors.

Assange's expulsion was preceded by the corruption scandal surrounding Moreno. In February, WikiLeaks published a package of INA Papers, which traced the operations of the offshore company INA Investment, founded by the brother of the Ecuadorian leader. Quito said it was a conspiracy between Assange and Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and former Ecuadorian leader Rafael Correa to overthrow Moreno.

In early April, Moreno complained about Assange's behavior at Ecuador's London mission. “We must protect the life of Mr. Assange, but he has already crossed all boundaries in terms of violating the agreement that we came to with him,” the president said. “This does not mean that he cannot speak freely, but he cannot lie and hack.” ". At the same time, back in February last year it became known that Assange at the embassy was deprived of the opportunity to interact with the outside world, in particular, his Internet access was cut off.

Why Sweden stopped its prosecution of Assange

At the end of last year, Western media, citing sources, reported that Assange would be charged in the United States. This was never officially confirmed, but it was because of Washington’s position that Assange had to take refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy six years ago.

In May 2017, Sweden stopped investigating two rape cases in which the portal’s founder was accused. Assange demanded compensation from the country's government for legal costs in the amount of 900 thousand euros.

Earlier, in 2015, Swedish prosecutors also dropped three charges against him due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.

Where did the investigation into the rape case lead?

Assange arrived in Sweden in the summer of 2010, hoping to receive protection from American authorities. But he was investigated for rape. In November 2010, a warrant was issued for his arrest in Stockholm, and Assange was put on the international wanted list. He was detained in London, but was soon released on bail of 240 thousand pounds.

In February 2011, a British court decided to extradite Assange to Sweden, after which a number of successful appeals followed for the WikiLeaks founder.

British authorities placed him under house arrest before deciding whether to extradite him to Sweden. Breaking his promise to the authorities, Assange asked for asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy, ​​which was granted to him. Since then, the UK has had its own claims against the WikiLeaks founder.

What awaits Assange now?

The man was re-arrested on a US extradition request for publishing classified documents, police said. At the same time, Deputy Head of the British Foreign Ministry Alan Duncan said that Assange would not be sent to the United States if he faced the death penalty there.

In the UK, Assange is likely to appear in court on the afternoon of April 11. This is stated on the WikiLeaks Twitter page. British authorities are likely to seek a maximum sentence of 12 months, the man's mother said, citing his lawyer.

At the same time, Swedish prosecutors are considering reopening the rape investigation. Attorney Elizabeth Massey Fritz, who represented the victim, will seek this.