The problem of love for one’s native people, homeland (according to Astafiev). The problem of love for the motherland essay The problem of love for the motherland conclusion
1) L.N. Tolstoy “War and Peace”.
The author reveals the problem of true patriotism through the image of Pierre Bezukhov, who wants to share the fate of the country and express his love for it. So he forms a regiment at his own expense. He himself remains in Moscow to kill Napoleon as the main culprit of national disasters. Pierre is not a military man, however, and he, gathering all his spiritual strength, begins to act.
2) Boris Vasiliev “Not on the lists.”
The main character, Nikolai Pluzhnikov, despite the lack of official assumption of duties, selflessly defends the Brest Fortress. The hero goes through a cruel school of maturity and spiritual growth, goes through fear and despair, becoming the hero of his Fatherland.
3) L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace"
The men Karp and Vlas not only refuse to sell hay to the French, but also burn everything that is left of the population and could be useful to the enemy.
They take up arms and join the partisans.
4) M.Yu Lermontov “Motherland”
The lyrical hero talks about his love for the Fatherland, admiring its rivers, seas and the charm of Russian villages. The hero admits: "...I love why, I don’t know myself..." It can be assumed that his connection with the Motherland is the result of a spiritual relationship with it, closeness to the life of a simple Russian person.
5) S. Yesenin “Go away, my dear Rus'”
Here we see the image of a lyrical hero in love with the nature of his homeland. It is in her that he finds his joy, it is she who helps him to feel a deep and pure love for his native land.
6) A.S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter"
Pyotr Grinev shows himself to be a brave, courageous young man who passionately loves his homeland. He risks everything by refusing to swear allegiance to Pugachev, he is a true patriot!
Date of publication: 02/02/2017
A verified essay based on the text: “A person loves the place of his birth and upbringing. This affection is common to all people and nations...”
Problem:
What is love for the Motherland? How does it manifest itself? The author of the text thinks about these questions. (It is better to write: “How is love for the Motherland manifested,” since the author does not ask the question: “What is the Motherland?”)
A comment:
Revealing this problem, Karamzin talks about two types of love for the Motherland: physical and moral. Physical love is based on the laws of nature, on the inalienable communications with the ground. Human connected with native places. He cannot live without them. It is this kind of love that is common to all peoples. Whereas there is also moral love, which is based on the soul’s attraction to family and close people. A person gets used to the people who surround him, to all the existing relationships. (The author’s position says almost the same thing + a lot of retelling)
Arguing about this, the author shows what feelings a person experiences for his Motherland, being at a distance from it. She attracts him with memories, events that happened in his native land. (When illustrating the problem, we must prove that the text contains the problem we have identified, give examples and trace the author’s train of thought)
Revealing this problem, the author discusses what connects a person with his native places. Karamzin says that the Motherland is dear to the heart not for its local beauties, but for its memories. Why? The answer to this question is contained in sentence 4-5. And even the unfavorable climate of their native lands is not able to repel a person; Karamzin gives the example of residents of cold countries who love the place in which they were born, despite its harshness, and compares a person with a plant that has more strength in its climate.
The author's position is this: love for the Fatherland has both a moral and physical basis. Every person lives easier and more joyfully in their native land. In addition, he will always find the support of people close to him. That is why both types of love affect a person in a certain way.
Thesis:
I agree with the author's opinion and believe that love for native Fatherland- this is a love for everything that surrounds people from an early age. That is why both physical and moral love must be combined in each of us. (When expressing your point of view, it is better to refrain from the words “must”, “impossible”, “must”, etc. Let me remind you that we are arguing our own point of view. How to prove that physical and moral love for the Motherland MUST be combined in everyone from U.S?)
Arguments:
To confirm the above, an example from the literature can be given.
In the poem by M.Yu. Lermontov's "Motherland" describes the poet's love for the Fatherland. He shows his affection for the country's landscapes against all odds. “The cold silence of its steppes, the swaying of its boundless forests...” And he also writes that he is ready to watch with pleasure “The dance with stomping and whistling, accompanied by the talk of drunken peasants.” With this poem, Lermontov expresses his love for people, nature, and the landscapes of his homeland.
The second example can be cited from life experience. At a time when literature was limited, most poets left (left) abroad. But homesickness never left them. They always remembered their native places, the people with whom they lived and came into contact. That is why writers in their poems (poems) tried to convey oppressive feeling for the Motherland.
Conclusion:
Thus, we can conclude that love for the Motherland is a need associated not only with constant attachment to native landscapes, but also with closeness to fellow countrymen.
Result: Overall, a good essay. There are mistakes, but with practice you can get rid of them. There are chances to write an essay with the highest score.
|
Formulation of source text problems |
|
In the text by K.G. Paustovsky, a famous Russian writer, a classic of Russian literature, raises the problem of the relationship between love for nature and love for the Motherland.
Reflecting on the problem, the author talks about the artist Berg, who grinned at the word “Motherland” and did not understand its meaning. The author noted that his friends told him with heavy reproach: “Eh, Berg, a crack soul!” K.G. Paustovsky tells that Berg did not like nature and did not understand all its beauty, which is why he was not successful in landscapes. The author is sure that if Berg does not feel a sense of love for nature, then he cannot love his Motherland.
K.G. Paustovsky describes the changes that happened to Berg after he visited the artist Yartsev and lived with him for about a month in the forests. The author notes that Berg began to admire nature, “examined flowers and herbs with curiosity,” and even painted his first landscape. K.G. Paustovsky says that after this trip Berg developed a “clear and joyful feeling of the Motherland”; he became connected with his country with all his heart. The author points out that love for the Fatherland made his life warmer, brighter, and more beautiful.
I agree with the opinion of K.G. Paustovsky. It is important that every person loves the Motherland, because love for nature makes a person’s life more colorful, interesting, and love for the Motherland also improves life, makes it more beautiful, easier and fun. In order for a person to enjoy life, he needs to appreciate, understand and love two closely related concepts: “nature” and “Motherland”, otherwise life will become dry, uninteresting and aimless. I will prove this idea by turning to the novel by the Russian writer Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev “Fathers and Sons.” This work tells about the nihilist Bazarov, who denied nature, he did not understand and did not appreciate it, and he also treated the Motherland, the country and the place where he was born and raised. As soon as before his death he realized that nature is eternal, it cannot be defeated, he realized that people die, but she remains, so majestic, magnificent and invincible. Bazarov realized that one cannot help but love nature, one must enjoy and admire it, just like the Motherland.
Another example is the play by A.N. Ostrovsky "The Thunderstorm". It tells about the tradesman Kuligin, who loved nature very much, he loved to admire it, and sang songs about it. Kuligin, just like nature, loved his homeland. He constantly came up with all sorts of inventions to make life easier and better for people in his native land, but, unfortunately, these ideas were not translated into reality. Kuligin sang nature, and therefore the Motherland, his beloved lands, where he was born and lived all his life.
Thus, we can conclude that if a person falls in love with nature, then he will definitely love his Motherland, because these are two closely related concepts.
Write an essay based on the text below. Volume of at least 150 words.
Formulate one of the problems posed by the author of the text.
Comment on the formulated problem. Include in your comment two illustrative examples from the text you read that you think are important for understanding the problem in the source text (avoid excessive quoting).
Formulate the position of the author (storyteller). Write whether you agree or disagree with the point of view of the author of the text you read. Explain why. Give at least two arguments, based primarily on reading experience, as well as knowledge and life observations.
Original text
There is a month above the window. There is wind under the window. The poplar that has flown around is silvery and bright...” comes from the receiver. And from the toes, hands, from the roots of the hair, from every cell of the body, a drop of blood rises to the heart, pricks it, fills it with tears and bitter delight, you want to run somewhere, hug someone alive, repent before the whole world or hide in a corner and cry out all the bitterness that is in the heart, and that which still remains in it.
Voiced women with a quiet sigh lead and talk about the month outside the window, about the little girl crying outside the outskirts, and I also feel sorry for these singers, I want to console them, feel sorry for them, reassure them. What a cleansing sorrow!
There is no month outside. It's foggy outside. It was exhausted from the earth, filled the forests, flooded the clearings, covered the river - everything was drowned in it. It's a rainy summer, the flax has died, the rye has fallen, and the barley is not growing. And all the fogs, fogs. It may be a month, but it is not visible, and in the villages they go to bed early. And not a single voice is heard. Nothing is heard, nothing is seen, the song has moved away from the village, life is dying out without it.
Across the river, in a deserted village, two old women live; they live apart in the summer and come together in one hut in the winter so that less wood is wasted.
A son from Leningrad came to visit one grandmother. For some reason he arrived in winter, walked up to his mother through the snowdrifts, knocked, but she didn’t let him in - she didn’t recognize him by his voice. Talyanka is crying, crying.
Just not there, not across the river, but in my heart. And I see everything in its original light, between summer and autumn, between evening and day. The old horse over there, the only one in three half-empty villages, is eating grass without interest. A drunken shepherd outside the outskirts barks his dead calves in a black voice. Anna, a young and old-looking woman, comes down to the river with a bucket.
“The distant cry of a Talyanka, a lonely voice...” Why is this and why is Yesenin sung and sung so little among us? The most melodious poet! Is it really possible that everyone rejects him even when he’s dead? Is it really scary to let him in among the people? The Russian people will take it and tear their shirt, and along with it they will tear their heart, so that they can suffer the torment that the poet, suffering at once from all the sufferings of his people, did not endure, did not experience. He suffers for all people, for every living creature, with a supreme torment inaccessible to us, which we often hear in ourselves and therefore we cling, reaching out to the word of the Ryazan guy, so that his pain, his all-world melancholy will echo again and again, stir up our soul.
I often feel him so close and dear to me that I talk to him in my sleep, call him brother, younger brother, sad brother, and I console him, I console him... Where can you console him? He is gone, the poor orphan. Only a bright soul hovers over Russia and worries, worries us with eternal sadness. And they explain everything to us and explain to us that he is not guilty of anything and that he is ours. Already the judges themselves, who determined who is “ours” and “not ours”, have become “not ours”, erased from human memory, the song, sound, sadness of the poet is with us forever, and everything is explained to us and explained to us by the inexplicable, incomprehensible. “It’s a month outside the window...” Darkness outside the window, empty villages and empty land. It’s unbearable to listen to Yesenin here.
The fogs lie around, dense, motionless, no sound breaks through. The light barely leaked from across the river like a faded speck in the village window. The old ladies are alive. We've worked hard. They're having dinner. Is it still evening or is it already night?
The grass is wet, the leaves are dripping, a horse snorts in a wet meadow, the tractor has fallen silent behind the village. And it lies endlessly, in forests and copses, among grains and flaxes, near rivers and lakes, with a silent church in the middle, mourned by the Russian singer.
Shut up, military trumpet! Calm down, eloquent speaker! Don't make faces, newfangled howler monkeys! Turn off the tape recorders and transistors, guys! Hats off, Russia! They sing Yesenin!
Astafiev Viktor Petrovich (1924-2001) – Russian writer
Composition
In this text, the outstanding Soviet writer Viktor Petrovich Astafiev raises the problem of love for one’s native people, homeland.
Revealing the problem, the author talks about Sergei Alexandrovich Yesenin, about his unbridled love for his homeland, for his people. Astafiev talks about how he suffered at once from all the torments of his people. Draws attention to how the poet’s soul was torn for all people, for every living creature.
The author believes that loving your people means being grateful to them, loving the land on which a person lives, loving everything good and beautiful that is connected with it.
I completely agree with the author and also believe that love for one’s people is love for one’s native language, the surrounding nature, cities, villages and towns where people live. I also believe that this love is expressed in the desire to protect and express the interests of one’s homeland.
I can prove the correctness of my point of view by referring to M.A. Sholokhov’s epic novel “Quiet Don”. Let us remember the conversation between Podesaul Atarshchikov and Evgeny Listnitsky about their attitude towards the people, towards the Cossacks, towards their homeland. Atarshchikov says: “...I love the Don to hell, this whole old way of Cossack life that has evolved over centuries. I love my Cossacks, Cossack women - I love everything! The smell of steppe wormwood makes me want to cry... And then, when the sunflower blooms and the smell of rain-drenched vineyards over the Don, I love so deeply and painfully...” So the author wants to say that love for the people is expressed in a person’s attachment to his native places, where he was born, where his parents, relatives and friends live.
As a second example, I will cite the poetry of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin. Reading Pushkin’s poems, you can’t help but feel with what warmth, love, joy and pride the poet speaks about his country. Russian morals, native nature and the history of the Fatherland appear before us in all their greatness and powerful beauty. Pushkin’s paintings of Russian nature are magical and poetic. “Autumn”, “Winter Morning”, “Winter Evening” immerse us in her mysterious world. Under the influence of Pushkin’s pen, you feel a surge of pride and admiration for Russian forests and meadows, rivers and lakes, our vast expanses. Pushkin’s work merged love of freedom and patriotism, faith in the future of his homeland and concern for the fate of the Russian people. That is why Pushkin, according to Gogol, “is an extraordinary phenomenon and, perhaps, the only manifestation of the Russian spirit.”
Thus, I want to say that every person needs to remember their loved ones, their Motherland. After all, sometimes such memories can save a life, give meaning to life to the desperate.
A person loves the place of his birth and upbringing. This attachment is common to all people and nations, it is a matter of nature and should be called physical. The homeland is dear to the heart not for its local beauty, not for its clear sky, not for its pleasant climate, but for its captivating memories surrounding, so to speak, the morning and the cradle of man. There is nothing sweeter in the world than life; it is the first happiness, and the beginning of all well-being has some special charm for our imagination. This is how friends consecrate in memory the first day of their friendship. Laplander born almost
In the grave of nature, on the edge of the world, in spite of everything, he loves the cold darkness of his land. Move him to happy Italy: he will turn his eyes and heart to the north, like a magnet; the bright shine of the sun will not produce such sweet feelings in his soul as a gloomy day, like the whistle of a storm, like falling snow: they remind him of the Fatherland!
It is not for nothing that a resident of Switzerland, removed from his snowy mountains, withers and falls into melancholy, and returning to wild Unterwalden, to the harsh Glaris, comes to life. Every plant has more strength in its climate: the law of nature does not change for humans.
I am not saying that the natural beauties and benefits of the Fatherland do not have any influence on the general love for it: some lands, enriched by nature, may be all the nicer to their inhabitants; I’m only saying that these beauties and benefits are not the main reason for people’s physical attachment to their fatherland, for then it would not be common.
With whom we grew up and live, we get used to them. Their soul conforms to ours, becomes a kind of its mirror, serves as an object or means of our moral pleasures and turns into an object of inclination for the heart. This love for fellow citizens, or for the people with whom we grew up, were brought up and live, is the second, or moral, love for the Fatherland, just as general as the first, local or physical, but acting stronger in some years, for time affirms habit.
It is necessary to see two fellow countrymen who find each other in a foreign land: with what pleasure they embrace and rush to pour out their souls in sincere conversations! They see each other for the first time, but they are already familiar and friendly, confirming their personal connection with some common ties of the Fatherland! It seems to them that, even speaking in a foreign language, they understand each other better than others, because there is always some similarity in the character of people from the same land. The inhabitants of one state always form, so to speak, an electrical circuit, conveying to them one impression through the most distant rings or links.
Nikolay Mikhailovich Karamzin (1766 - 1826) - Russian historian, writer, poet; creator of “History of the Russian State” - one of the first generalizing works on the history of Russia. In his article he describes the problem of feeling love for the Motherland.
This problem is very relevant today, since a person cannot imagine his life without his homeland, without his native land, on which he feels free and good.
Nikolai Mikhailovich narrates, “A person loves the place of his birth and upbringing.”
N. M. Karamzin narrates: “The Motherland is dear to the heart not for its local beauties, not for its clear sky, not for its pleasant climate, but for its captivating memories surrounding, so to speak, the morning and the cradle of man.”
The writer says: “With whom we grew up and live, we get used to them.”
And the author believes that love for the Fatherland has a moral and physical basis.
I share the opinion of Nikolai Mikhailovich Karamzin. Indeed, love for the Motherland is fraught with tender memories.
Firstly, let's remember the extraordinary poem by Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov “I love the Fatherland, but with a strange love!” In this poem, the poet describes the feelings that are inherent in him in relation to his native place. He conveys to us his emotions and memories. And we notice how much the poet valued the place where he was born.
Secondly, I have one friend who came from abroad to Russia. They moved here 9 years ago. And every time she tells me about how beautiful her homeland is and what it means to her. She tells all the memories she has of this place!
Thus, I want to draw a conclusion. Homeland is an integral part of human life. And love for the Motherland is expressed through memories.
(No ratings yet)
Essays on topics:
- Where does love for one’s native land and its vastness begin? Much has been written about this. The lyrics to the song immediately come to mind...