To the uprising of A.S. Pushkin treated it with bitterness because he understood that it did not arise out of nowhere. At the same time, he saw the futility of such an attempt to improve life: it immediately turned into robbery, murder and mutual bitterness. “God forbid we see a Russian revolt, senseless and merciless!” - he writes.
The rebels are shown in different ways. Either they are written about as Pugachev’s “terrible comrades”, “villains”, or the simple-minded Cossack constable Maksimych is described, whom the tongue cannot dare to call a traitor - it is not for nothing that Grinev was glad to see him during the shootout near Orenburg. Sympathy for the rebels is clear in the episode when Captain Mironov interrogated the old Bashkir. The brutal suppression unwittingly prepared the way for future protests. Of course, A.S. Pushkin himself was a nobleman and a son of his time, so he could quite sincerely write about “crafty rebels who were evil in secret.” What is important is that in depicting individuals and specific situations he was guided by an objective consideration of what might happen.
The author's attitude towards Grinev can be understood by indirect signs, because the story is spoken on behalf of Grinev himself. Of course, the author sympathizes with the narrator because he sometimes puts unflattering characteristics into his mouth - for example, when he yelled at Savelich after losing to Zurin. At the same time, Grinev talks calmly about his exploits, without resorting to exaggeration or narcissism. It is obvious that Grinev writes directly and honestly, and this is the main measure of the author’s attitude towards him.
To Pugachev A.S. Pushkin treated him as a complex, contradictory personality, as evidenced by episodes with his participation, when he was in a different state of mind, performing various actions. He could be angry and cruel - so he executed the officers of the Belogorsk fortress; could be sincere and soulful when telling a Kalmyk fairy tale; he remembered not only evil, but also good, valued calm courage and at the same time loved to boast and boast, as if he were playing some kind of children's game. It is worth remembering the technique of literary parallelism, often used by A.S. Pushkin: kindest Andrei Karlovich Reinsdorp,
The commandant of Orenburg refuses to help Grinev rescue the daughter of a heroically deceased officer, and Pugachev does it willingly. Again, Pugachev released Grinev, and Catherine II did not pardon Grinev at all, but helped the daughter of Captain Mironov, who she liked.
Masha Mironova herself also goes through a difficult path of growing up. From a naive girl who had seen nothing in her life except the Belogorsk fortress and was constantly silent, she grew into a selfless young woman, ready to go to distant and terrible St. Petersburg to save her loved one and seek an audience with the empress herself. The author seems to admire her modesty, ingenuousness and fidelity, constantly focusing on the fact that she did not behave and firmly defended feminine dignity and her choice

Images of the Russian nobility in the novel by A.S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter"

3. The author’s attitude towards the main characters

Pushkin showed the image of Grinev in development: a crazy boy, a young man asserting his independence, a courageous and persistent adult. The events in which he finds himself are what make him so fast. For Pyotr Grinev, honor is loyalty to service and class. In the famous conversation with Pugachev we see a brave nobleman. Finding himself among enemies in a rebellious settlement, he behaves with great dignity. In relation to himself from Pugachev, he does not even allow a mocking tone. He does not need a life bought at the price of humiliating his noble rank. Grinev also truly loves. He saves the life of Masha Mironova, putting his own in danger. At the trial, Peter does not name the girl, preferring to be convicted. The quarrel with Shvabrin speaks of the nobility of Grinev, who stands up for the honor of Masha, whose love for himself he does not know. Shvabrin's vulgarity outrages him. Peter tries to hide his triumph over the defeated Shvabrin. By pitting Grinev and Shvabrin against each other in various life situations, the writer shows that the most important thing in a person is not education and external brilliance of the mind, but devotion to convictions and nobility.

By depicting Grinev and Shvabrin, Pushkin denies the possibility of an alliance between the nobility and the rebellious peasantry. People like Shvabrin join the uprising because they have no principles, no honor, no conscience and are driven by personal goals.

The writer does not think of hiding the class psychology of the Grinevs. He shows that even the morality of the most honest and just landowners is influenced by the power of the serf owner. Those actions of Pyotr Grinev that are worthy of condemnation are associated with his attitude towards the serfs, and above all towards his faithful servant Savelich. I remember that one day Petrusha almost left his uncle among his enemies.

The author characterizes Alexey Shvabrin as a cynical, empty person, capable of slandering a girl only because she refused to reciprocate his feelings. Shvabrin commits a number of vile acts that characterize him as a low person, capable of treason, cowardice, and betrayal. This character remains one of the most striking images of a traitor in Russian literature.

German Avgustovich Larosh - music and literary critic

Laroche's love for Flaubert runs through his entire life, which can be compared with the feeling he felt for Berlioz. But if the composer, by personality and temperament, was the psychological antithesis of Laroche...

Historical songs of the 17th century, their place in folklore

Of the songs in the “Time of Troubles,” the song about Grishka Otrepiev received the most distribution, which expressed the sharply negative attitude of the people towards False Dmitry, who is depicted as an obvious impostor who betrayed national interests...

My favorite writer D. Tolkien

Tolkien, John Ronald Ruel (1892-1973), English writer, doctor of literature, artist, professor, philologist-linguist. One of the creators of the Oxford English Dictionary...

Analyzing the text of “A Hero of Our Time” by Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov, we can come to the conclusion that Pechorin was familiar with the best examples of world prose of that time. Among the listed authors: Rousseau, Scott, Byron...

About Pechorin’s erudition based on the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "Hero of Our Time"

Pechorin loved poetry no less than prose, and perhaps even more. This hypothesis is supported by references to Goethe, Pushkin, and repeated references to Byron. “Although in her indirect views I read something wild and suspicious...

The image of the main character in Lyudmila Ulitskaya's novel "Sincerely yours Shurik"

One of Shurik's distinctive features is the ability to acutely feel guilt towards himself. The death of his grandmother: “And Shurik, no amount of loud music, could drown out the enormous feeling of guilt, which outweighed the loss itself in him...

The main themes and ideas of Marina Tsvetaeva's lyrics

Love for the homeland is a truly poetic quality. Without love for the homeland there is no poet. And Tsvetaeva’s path in poetry is marked by many signs of this love - guilt, love - devotion, love - dependence, love that, probably...

The problem of ecology and moral problems of narration in the stories of V. Astafiev "The Tsar Fish"

The image of the author unites all chapters of the work. There are chapters given only to him, where everything is in the first person, and we comprehend the character of the hero, his worldview, his philosophy, often expressed with journalistic pathos...

Prose of Tatyana Tolstoy

The antagonist of the heroes in the stories is the author, the antithesis of a dead-end existence is creativity, which makes it possible to overcome something within oneself, to fully express something that is psychologically stagnant and tormented by melancholy and fears...

Retrospective of political and social events of 1933-1945. in Germany in fiction and journalism

The difficult history of the relationship between the Russian and German peoples, who went through the crucible of two devastating world wars in the 20th century, is the subject of study for many researchers from both countries. A special place among the problems...

Novel "Abai's Path"

In the conditions of patriarchal-feudal life, a woman’s rights were limited, not to mention the fact that her participation in public and state activities was completely excluded. Such customs were legalized by the norms of Kazakh customary law...

Tales of A.S. Pushkin, included in the circle of children's reading

In Pushkin's fairy tales, folk poetics becomes a powerful means of realistic depiction of life and helps the poet penetrate into the psychology of the heroes. Surprisingly easy...

Similarities and differences in the character and activities of Woland and Mephistotle

“...Without you I am a ghost that was expelled from the temple, Without me you are a boring myth. You and I are like brothers in hymns and curses, With eternal power over people.” There are different legends about who Satan is. According to the Bible...

Theme of money in Russian literature

A new stage in the development of the topic of money was the cycle of stories and essays “Notes of a Hunter.” I.S. Turgenev. “You finally need to know your worth,” “you got off cheap!”, “not worth a penny,” “I won’t regret any money”...

Help URGENTLY!!! I WILL GIVE 50 POINTS TO THOSE WHO GIVE THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THE STORY THE CAPTAIN'S DAUGHTER. Author A.S. Pushkin.

How does the author relate to the characters? Support your opinion with quotes from the text of the work. What can be said about Pushkin’s attitude towards the uprising, the rebels, Grinev, Pugachev, Masha Mironova and Shvabrin.

A.S. Pushkin treats the uprising with bitterness, because he understood that it did not arise out of nowhere. At the same time, he saw the futility of such an attempt to improve life: it immediately turned into robbery, murder and mutual bitterness. “God forbid we see a Russian revolt, senseless and merciless!” writes the author.

The rebels are shown in different ways. Either they are written about as Pugachev’s “terrible comrades”, “villains”, or the simple-minded Cossack constable Maksimych is described, whom the tongue cannot dare to call a traitor - it is not for nothing that Grinev was glad to see him during the shootout near Orenburg. Naturally, sympathy for the rebels in the episode when Captain Mironov interrogated the old Bashkir. The brutal suppression unwittingly prepared the way for future protests.

The author's attitude towards Grinev can be understood by indirect signs, because the speech in the story comes from Grinev himself. Of course, the author sympathizes with the narrator because he sometimes puts unflattering characteristics into his mouth - for example, when Grinev yelled at Savelich after losing to Zurin. It is obvious that Grinev writes directly and honestly, and this is the main sign of the author’s attitude towards him.

Image of Alexey Shvabrin

It is worth paying attention to the composition of the novel. The entire work is preceded by a general epigraph taken from folk art, which confirms the writer’s idea about the kinship of the people and the nobility. This is a proverb: “Take care of your honor from a young age,” which determines the life path of the heroes of “The Captain’s Daughter,” as well as the author’s attitude to what is described in the novel.

The author's attitude towards the main characters

Pushkin showed the image of Grinev in development: a crazy boy, a young man asserting his independence, a courageous and persistent adult. The events in which he finds himself are what make him so fast. For Pyotr Grinev, honor is loyalty to service and class. In the famous conversation with Pugachev we see a brave nobleman. Finding himself among enemies in a rebellious settlement, he behaves with great dignity. In relation to himself from Pugachev, he does not even allow a mocking tone. He does not need a life bought at the price of humiliating his noble rank. Grinev also truly loves. He saves the life of Masha Mironova, putting his own in danger. At the trial, Peter does not name the girl, preferring to be convicted. The quarrel with Shvabrin speaks of the nobility of Grinev, who stands up for the honor of Masha, whose love for himself he does not know. Shvabrin's vulgarity outrages him. Peter tries to hide his triumph over the defeated Shvabrin. By pitting Grinev and Shvabrin against each other in various life situations, the writer shows that the most important thing in a person is not education and external brilliance of the mind, but devotion to convictions and nobility.

By depicting Grinev and Shvabrin, Pushkin denies the possibility of an alliance between the nobility and the rebellious peasantry. People like Shvabrin join the uprising because they have no principles, no honor, no conscience and are driven by personal goals.

The writer does not think of hiding the class psychology of the Grinevs. He shows that even the morality of the most honest and just landowners is influenced by the power of the serf owner. Those actions of Pyotr Grinev that are worthy of condemnation are associated with his attitude towards the serfs, and above all towards his faithful servant Savelich. I remember that one day Petrusha almost left his uncle among his enemies.

The author characterizes Alexey Shvabrin as a cynical, empty person, capable of slandering a girl only because she refused to reciprocate his feelings. Shvabrin commits a number of vile acts that characterize him as a low person, capable of treason, cowardice, and betrayal. This character remains one of the most striking images of a traitor in Russian literature.

To the uprising of A.C. Pushkin treated it with bitterness because he understood that it did not arise out of nowhere. At the same time, he saw the futility of such an attempt to improve life: it immediately turned into robbery, murder and mutual bitterness. “God forbid we see a Russian revolt, senseless and merciless!” - he writes.

The rebels are shown in different ways. Either they are written about as Pugachev’s “terrible comrades”, “villains”, or the simple-minded Cossack constable Maksimych is described, whom the tongue cannot dare to call a traitor - it is not for nothing that Grinev was glad to see him during the shootout near Orenburg. Sympathy for the rebels is clear in the episode when Captain Mironov interrogated the old Bashkir. The brutal suppression unwittingly prepared the way for future protests. Of course A.C. Pushkin himself was a nobleman and a son of his time, so he could quite sincerely write about “crafty rebels who were evil in secret.” What is important is that in depicting individuals and specific situations he was guided by an objective consideration of what might happen.

The author's attitude towards Grinev can be understood by indirect signs, because the speech in the story comes from the perspective of Grinev himself. Of course, the author sympathizes with the narrator because he sometimes puts unflattering characteristics into his mouth - for example, when he yelled at Savelich after losing to Zurin. At the same time, Grinev talks calmly about his exploits, without resorting to exaggeration or narcissism. It is obvious that Grinev writes directly and honestly, and this is the main measure of the author’s attitude towards him.
To Pugachev A.S. Pushkin treated him as a complex, contradictory personality, as evidenced by episodes with his participation, when he was in a different state of mind, performing various actions. He could be angry and cruel - so he executed the officers of the Belogorsk fortress; could be sincere and soulful when telling a Kalmyk fairy tale; he remembered not only evil, but also good, valued calm courage and at the same time loved to boast and boast, as if he were playing some kind of children's game. It is worth remembering the technique of literary parallelism, often used by A.S. Pushkin: the kind Andrei Karlovich Reinsdorp, commandant of Orenburg, refuses to help Grinev rescue the daughter of a heroically deceased officer, and Pugachev does it willingly. Again, Pugachev released Grinev, and Catherine II did not pardon Grinev at all, but helped the daughter of Captain Mironov she liked.

Masha Mironova herself also goes through a difficult path of growing up. From a naive girl who had seen nothing in her life except the Belogorsk fortress and was constantly silent, she grew into a selfless young woman, ready to go to distant and terrible St. Petersburg to save her loved one and seek an audience with the empress herself. The author seems to admire her modesty, ingenuousness and fidelity, constantly focusing on the fact that she did not behave and firmly defended female dignity and her choice.