The most terrible and secret secrets of the Soviet Union. Terrible secrets of the USSR


The scientific data below is a terrible secret. Formally, this data is not classified, since it was obtained by American scientists outside the field of defense research, and was even published in some places, but the conspiracy of silence organized around it is unprecedented.

What is this terrible secret, the mention of which is a worldwide taboo? This is the secret of the origin and historical path of the Russian people.

Why information is hidden - more on that later. First, briefly about the essence of the discovery of American geneticists.

There are 46 chromosomes in human DNA, half of which he inherits from his father, half from his mother. Of the 23 chromosomes received from the father, only one - the male Y chromosome - contains a set of nucleotides that is passed on from generation to generation without any changes for thousands of years. Geneticists call this set a haplogroup. Every man living now has in his DNA exactly the same haplogroup as his father, grandfather, great-grandfather, great-great-grandfather, etc. for many generations.

Thus, American scientists found that one such mutation occurred 4,500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain. A boy was born with a slightly different haplogroup than his father, to which they assigned the genetic classification R1a1. The paternal R1a mutated and a new R1a1 emerged.

The mutation turned out to be very viable. The R1a1 genus, which was started by this same boy, survived, unlike millions of other genera that disappeared when their genealogical lines were cut off, and multiplied over a vast space. Currently, holders of haplogroup R1a1 make up 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, and in ancient Russian cities and villages - up to 80%. R1a1 is a biological marker of the Russian ethnic group. This set of nucleotides is “Russianness” from a genetic point of view.

Thus, the Russian people in a genetically modern form were born in the European part of present-day Russia about 4,500 years ago. A boy with the R1a1 mutation became the direct ancestor of all men now living on earth whose DNA contains this haplogroup. All of them are his biological or, as they used to say, blood descendants and among themselves - blood relatives, together making up a single people - the Russians.

Realizing this, American geneticists, with the enthusiasm inherent in all emigrants in questions of origin, began to wander around the world, take tests from people and look for biological “roots”, their own and others. What they accomplished is of great interest to us, since it sheds true light on the historical paths of our Russian people and destroys many established myths.

Now men of the Russian genus R1a1 make up 16% of the total male population of India, and in the upper castes there are almost half of them - 47%

Our ancestors migrated from their ethnic home not only to the east (to the Urals) and south (to India and Iran), but also to the west – to where European countries are now located. In the western direction, geneticists have complete statistics: in Poland, holders of the Russian (Aryan) haplogroup R1a1 make up 57% of the male population, in Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia - 40%, in Germany, Norway and Sweden - 18%, in Bulgaria - 12 %, and in England - the least (3%).

The settlement of Russian-Aryans to the east, south and west (there was simply nowhere to go further to the north; and so, according to the Indian Vedas, before coming to India they lived near the Arctic Circle) became a biological prerequisite for the formation of a special language group - Indo-European. These are almost all European languages, some languages ​​of modern Iran and India and, of course, the Russian language and ancient Sanskrit, which are closest to each other for the obvious reason: in time (Sanskrit) and in space (Russian language) they stand next to the original source - Aryan the proto-language from which all other Indo-European languages ​​grew.

“It’s impossible to dispute. You need to shut up"

The above are irrefutable natural scientific facts, moreover, obtained by independent American scientists. Disputing them is the same as disagreeing with the results of a blood test in a clinic. They are not disputed. They are simply kept silent. They are hushed up unanimously and stubbornly, they are hushed up, one might say, completely. And there are reasons for this.

For example, we will have to rethink everything that is known about the Tatar-Mongol invasion of Rus'. The armed conquest of peoples and lands was always and everywhere accompanied at that time by the mass rape of local women. Traces in the form of Mongolian and Turkic haplogroups should have remained in the blood of the male part of the Russian population. But they are not there! Solid R1a1 - and nothing more, the purity of the blood is amazing. This means that the Horde that came to Rus' was not at all what is commonly thought of it: if the Mongols were present there, then in statistically insignificant numbers, and it is generally unclear who was called “Tatars”. Well, which scientist will refute scientific foundations, supported by mountains of literature and great authorities?!

The second reason, incomparably more significant, relates to the sphere of geopolitics. The history of human civilization appears in a new and completely unexpected light, and this cannot but have serious political consequences.

Throughout modern history, the pillars of European scientific and political thought proceeded from the idea of ​​Russians as barbarians who had recently climbed down from the trees, naturally backward and incapable of creative work. And suddenly it turns out that the Russians are the same Aryans who had a decisive influence on the formation of great civilizations in India, Iran and in Europe itself! That Europeans owe a lot to Russians for their prosperous lives, starting with the languages ​​they speak. It is no coincidence that in recent history, a third of the most important discoveries and inventions belong to ethnic Russians in Russia itself and abroad. It is no coincidence that the Russian people were able to repel the invasions of the united forces of continental Europe led by Napoleon and then Hitler. Etc.

Great historical tradition


It is no coincidence, because behind all this there is a great historical tradition, thoroughly forgotten over many centuries, but remaining in the collective subconscious of the Russian people and manifesting itself whenever the nation faces new challenges. Manifesting itself with iron inevitability due to the fact that it grew on a material, biological basis in the form of Russian blood, which remains unchanged for four and a half millennia.

Western politicians and ideologists have a lot to think about in order to make their policy towards Russia more adequate in the light of the historical circumstances discovered by geneticists. But they don’t want to think or change anything, hence the conspiracy of silence around the Russian-Aryan topic.

The collapse of the myth of the Russian people


The collapse of the myth of the Russian people as an ethnic mixture automatically destroys another myth - the myth of the multinationality of Russia. Until now, they have tried to present the ethno-demographic structure of our country as a vinaigrette from the Russian “you won’t understand what the mixture is” and many indigenous peoples and newcomer diasporas. With such a structure, all its components are approximately equal in size, so Russia is supposedly “multinational.”

But genetic studies provide a completely different picture. If you believe the Americans (and there is no reason not to believe them: they are authoritative scientists, they value their reputation, and they have no reason to lie in such a pro-Russian way), then it turns out that 70% of the entire male population of Russia are purebred Russians. According to the data of the penultimate census (the results of the latter are still unknown), 80% of respondents consider themselves Russian, i.e. 10% more are Russified representatives of other nations (it is in these 10%, if you “scratch”, that you will find non-Russian roots). And 20% falls on the remaining 170-odd peoples, nationalities and tribes living on the territory of the Russian Federation. Total: Russia is a mono-ethnic country, albeit multi-ethnic, with an overwhelming demographic majority of natural Russians. This is where Jan Hus' logic comes into play.

About backwardness


Next - about backwardness. The clergy thoroughly contributed to this myth: they say that before the baptism of Rus', people lived in complete savagery. Wow, “wildness”! They mastered half the world, built great civilizations, taught the aborigines their language, and all this long before the birth of Christ... Real history does not fit in, it does not fit in with its church version. There is something primordial, natural in the Russian people that cannot be reduced to religious life.

In the north-east of Europe, in addition to the Russians, many peoples lived and still live, but none of them created anything even remotely similar to the great Russian civilization. The same applies to other places of civilizational activity of the Russian-Aryans in ancient times. Natural conditions are different everywhere, and the ethnic environment is different, therefore the civilizations built by our ancestors are not the same, but there is something common to all of them: they are great on the historical scale of values ​​and far surpass the achievements of their neighbors.

The scientific data below is a terrible secret. Formally, this data is not classified, since it was obtained by American scientists outside the field of defense research, and was even published in some places, but the conspiracy of silence organized around it is unprecedented.

What is this terrible secret, the mention of which is a worldwide taboo? This is the secret of the origin and historical path of the Russian people.

Agnation.

Why information is hidden - more on that later. First, briefly about the essence of the discovery of American geneticists.
There are 46 chromosomes in human DNA, half of which he inherits from his father, half from his mother. Of the 23 chromosomes received from the father, only one - the male Y chromosome - contains a set of nucleotides that is passed on from generation to generation without any changes for thousands of years. Geneticists call this set a haplogroup. Every man living now has in his DNA exactly the same haplogroup as his father, grandfather, great-grandfather, great-great-grandfather, etc. for many generations.

Thus, American scientists found that one such mutation occurred 4,500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain. A boy was born with a slightly different haplogroup than his father, to which they assigned the genetic classification R1a1. The paternal R1a mutated and a new R1a1 emerged.

The mutation turned out to be very viable. The R1a1 genus, which was started by this same boy, survived, unlike millions of other genera that disappeared when their genealogical lines were cut off, and multiplied over a vast space. Currently, holders of haplogroup R1a1 make up 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, and in ancient Russian cities and villages - up to 80%. R1a1 is a biological marker of the Russian ethnic group. This set of nucleotides is “Russianness” from a genetic point of view.

Thus, the Russian people in a genetically modern form were born in the European part of present-day Russia about 4,500 years ago. A boy with the R1a1 mutation became the direct ancestor of all men now living on earth whose DNA contains this haplogroup. All of them are his biological or, as they used to say, blood descendants and among themselves - blood relatives, together making up a single people - the Russians.

Realizing this, American geneticists, with the enthusiasm inherent in all emigrants in questions of origin, began to wander around the world, take tests from people and look for biological “roots”, their own and others. What they accomplished is of great interest to us, since it sheds true light on the historical paths of our Russian people and destroys many established myths.

Now men of the Russian genus R1a1 make up 16% of the total male population of India, and in the upper castes there are almost half of them - 47%
Our ancestors migrated from their ethnic home not only to the east (to the Urals) and south (to India and Iran), but also to the west – to where European countries are now located. In the western direction, geneticists have complete statistics: in Poland, holders of the Russian (Aryan) haplogroup R1a1 make up 57% of the male population, in Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia - 40%, in Germany, Norway and Sweden - 18%, in Bulgaria - 12 %, and in England - the least (3%).

The settlement of Russian-Aryans to the east, south and west (there was simply nowhere to go further to the north; and so, according to the Indian Vedas, before coming to India they lived near the Arctic Circle) became a biological prerequisite for the formation of a special language group - Indo-European. These are almost all European languages, some languages ​​of modern Iran and India and, of course, the Russian language and ancient Sanskrit, which are closest to each other for the obvious reason: in time (Sanskrit) and in space (Russian language) they stand next to the original source - Aryan the proto-language from which all other Indo-European languages ​​grew.

“It’s impossible to dispute. You need to shut up"

The above are irrefutable natural scientific facts, moreover, obtained by independent American scientists. Disputing them is the same as disagreeing with the results of a blood test in a clinic. They are not disputed. They are simply kept silent. They are hushed up unanimously and stubbornly, they are hushed up, one might say, completely. And there are reasons for this.

For example, we will have to rethink everything that is known about the Tatar-Mongol invasion of Rus'. The armed conquest of peoples and lands was always and everywhere accompanied at that time by the mass rape of local women. Traces in the form of Mongolian and Turkic haplogroups should have remained in the blood of the male part of the Russian population. But they are not there! Solid R1a1 – and nothing more, the purity of the blood is amazing. This means that the Horde that came to Rus' was not at all what is commonly thought of it: if the Mongols were present there, then in statistically insignificant numbers, and it is generally unclear who was called “Tatars”. Well, which scientist will refute scientific foundations, supported by mountains of literature and great authorities?!

The second reason, incomparably more significant, relates to the sphere of geopolitics. The history of human civilization appears in a new and completely unexpected light, and this cannot but have serious political consequences.

Throughout modern history, the pillars of European scientific and political thought proceeded from the idea of ​​Russians as barbarians who had recently climbed down from the trees, naturally backward and incapable of creative work. And suddenly it turns out that the Russians are the same Aryans who had a decisive influence on the formation of great civilizations in India, Iran and Europe itself! That Europeans owe a lot to Russians for their prosperous lives, starting with the languages ​​they speak. It is no coincidence that in recent history, a third of the most important discoveries and inventions belong to ethnic Russians in Russia itself and abroad. It is no coincidence that the Russian people were able to repel the invasions of the united forces of continental Europe led by Napoleon and then Hitler. Etc.

Great historical tradition.

It is no coincidence, because behind all this there is a great historical tradition, thoroughly forgotten over many centuries, but remaining in the collective subconscious of the Russian people and manifesting itself whenever the nation faces new challenges. Manifesting itself with iron inevitability due to the fact that it grew on a material, biological basis in the form of Russian blood, which remains unchanged for four and a half millennia.
Western politicians and ideologists have a lot to think about in order to make their policy towards Russia more adequate in the light of the historical circumstances discovered by geneticists. But they don’t want to think or change anything, hence the conspiracy of silence around the Russian-Aryan topic.

The collapse of the myth about the Russian people.

The collapse of the myth of the Russian people as an ethnic mixture automatically destroys another myth - the myth of the multinationality of Russia. Until now, they have tried to present the ethno-demographic structure of our country as a vinaigrette from the Russian “you won’t understand what the mixture is” and many indigenous peoples and newcomer diasporas. With such a structure, all its components are approximately equal in size, so Russia is supposedly “multinational.”

But genetic studies provide a completely different picture. If you believe the Americans (and there is no reason not to believe them: they are authoritative scientists, they value their reputation, and they have no reason to lie in such a pro-Russian way), then it turns out that 70% of the entire male population of Russia are purebred Russians. According to the data of the penultimate census (the results of the latter are still unknown), 80% of respondents consider themselves Russian, i.e. 10% more are Russified representatives of other nations (it is in these 10%, if you “scratch”, that you will find non-Russian roots). And 20% falls on the remaining 170-odd peoples, nationalities and tribes living on the territory of the Russian Federation. Total: Russia is a mono-ethnic country, albeit multi-ethnic, with an overwhelming demographic majority of natural Russians. This is where Jan Hus' logic comes into play.

About backwardness.

Next - about backwardness. The clergy thoroughly contributed to this myth: they say that before the baptism of Rus', people lived in complete savagery. Wow, “wildness”! They mastered half the world, built great civilizations, taught the aborigines their language, and all this long before the birth of Christ... Real history does not fit in, it does not fit in with its church version. There is something primordial, natural in the Russian people that cannot be reduced to religious life.

In the north-east of Europe, in addition to the Russians, many peoples lived and still live, but none of them created anything even remotely similar to the great Russian civilization. The same applies to other places of civilizational activity of the Russian-Aryans in ancient times. Natural conditions are different everywhere, and the ethnic environment is different, therefore the civilizations built by our ancestors are not the same, but there is something common to all of them: they are great on the historical scale of values ​​and far surpass the achievements of their neighbors.(

Original taken from selenadia V

Original taken from milewski_igor in Secret History of Russia. Phaistos disc.

E. Koparev

Phaistos disc

In historical science until the 19th century, when deciphering monuments of Antiquity and the Middle Ages
all languages ​​of the world were used, including the “dead” ones, but the Russian language was not used.
Russian historians themselves are criminally guilty of this.

The first to use the Russian language in deciphering ancient written monuments
Slavic scholar of the 19th century, p olyak F. Volansky, whose works he included in his book
“New materials for the ancient history of the Slavs in general and the Slavic-Russians before Rurik’s time in particular” (M., Moscow State University, 1854) Ph.D. E.I.Klassen.
Klassen notes that some German historians tried to conscientiously study Russian history,
but they turned out to be unprepared for this, since they did not know the Russian language.
In the same time, Cool about the “founders” of Russian history in its present version - the Germans,
who worked in Russia in the 18th century, responds extremely negative.
He's writing: “These unscrupulous persons include: Bayer, Müller, Schlozer, Gebgardi, Parrott, Galling, Georgi and a whole phalanx of their followers.
They adopted everything Russian and characteristic of their tribe and even tried to take away
The Slavic-Russians have not only their glory, greatness, power, wealth, industry, trade
and all the good qualities of the heart, but even their tribal name is the name Russov, known from time immemorial as Slavyanskoe,
not only to all tribes Asian, but also Israelis, from the time of their coming to the promised land.

And among them the Russians are at the head of not only the Romans, but also the ancient Greeks - like their ancestors...
We know that history should not be a panegyric, but we will not allow them to turn Russian history into satire.”

Klassen criticizes the Norman theory, dominant to this day in historical science:
“Unfortunately, I must say that some Slavic writers, like Karamzin, Dobrovsky and others - known or unknown - but not completely alien to this sin. But perhaps these scientists were afraid to go against the imaginary authorities of that time. - We are not talking about some of the newest Russian historians; let them, hand on heart, tell themselves why they are trying to develop the Schlozer system and stigmatize the ancient Slavs.”
F. Volansky was the first to read the ancient written monuments of Europe, which turned out to be written in Russian.
We are talking about numerous archaeological monuments that were discovered not only in Europe, but in Asia and Africa during excavations and the inscriptions on which Western European scientists could not read, since they deciphered them on the basis of Western European languages.
F . Volansky wrote:
« Scientists stumbled upon these monuments and worked in vain until our time to analyze their inscriptions in the Greek and Latin alphabets, and seeing the inapplicability of such, they searched in vain for the key in the Hebrew language, because this mysterious key to all the unsolved inscriptions is found only in the Slavic primitive language...
How far the residence of the Slavs in Africa extended in ancient times, let the Slavic inscriptions on the stones of Numidia, Carthage and Egypt prove it.”

P.P. Oreshkin I also read in Russian the most ancient written monuments of Western Europe, and then the hieroglyphs of Ancient Egypt.
From the work of P.P. Oreshkin it logically follows that the state of the Etruscans, Ancient Egypt, Ancient India, Byzantium are components of the Great Empire of Rus', because the peoples inhabiting these components
spoke Russian.

In Secret History of Russia. Phaistos disc.

E. Koparev

Phaistos disc

In historical science until the 19th century, when deciphering monuments of Antiquity and the Middle Ages
all languages ​​of the world were used, including the “dead” ones, but the Russian language was not used.
Russian historians themselves are criminally guilty of this.

The first to use the Russian language in deciphering ancient written monuments
Slavic scholar of the 19th century, p olyak F. Volansky, whose works he included in his book
“New materials for the ancient history of the Slavs in general and the Slavic-Russians before Rurik’s time in particular” (M., Moscow State University, 1854) Ph.D. E.I.Klassen.
Klassen notes that some German historians tried to conscientiously study Russian history,
but they turned out to be unprepared for this, since they did not know the Russian language.
In the same time, Cool about the “founders” of Russian history in its present version - the Germans,
who worked in Russia in the 18th century, responds extremely negative.
He's writing: “These unscrupulous persons include: Bayer, Müller, Schlozer, Gebgardi, Parrott, Galling, Georgi and a whole phalanx of their followers.
They adopted everything Russian and characteristic of their tribe and even tried to take away
The Slavic-Russians have not only their glory, greatness, power, wealth, industry, trade
and all the good qualities of the heart, but even their tribal name is the name Russov, known from time immemorial as Slavyanskoe,
not only to all tribes Asian, but also Israelis, from the time of their coming to the promised land.

And among them the Russians are at the head of not only the Romans, but also the ancient Greeks - like their ancestors...
We know that history should not be a panegyric, but we will not allow them to turn Russian history into satire.”

Klassen criticizes the Norman theory, dominant to this day in historical science:
“Unfortunately, I must say that some Slavic writers, like Karamzin, Dobrovsky and others - known or unknown - but not completely alien to this sin. But perhaps these scientists were afraid to go against the imaginary authorities of that time. - We are not talking about some of the newest Russian historians; let them, hand on heart, tell themselves why they are trying to develop the Schlozer system and stigmatize the ancient Slavs.”
F. Volansky was the first to read the ancient written monuments of Europe, which turned out to be written in Russian.
We are talking about numerous archaeological monuments that were discovered not only in Europe, but in Asia and Africa during excavations and the inscriptions on which Western European scientists could not read, since they deciphered them on the basis of Western European languages.
F . Volansky wrote:
« Scientists stumbled upon these monuments and worked in vain until our time to analyze their inscriptions in the Greek and Latin alphabets, and seeing the inapplicability of such, they searched in vain for the key in the Hebrew language, because this mysterious key to all the unsolved inscriptions is found only in the Slavic primitive language...
How far the residence of the Slavs in Africa extended in ancient times, let the Slavic inscriptions on the stones of Numidia, Carthage and Egypt prove it.”

P.P. Oreshkin I also read in Russian the most ancient written monuments of Western Europe, and then the hieroglyphs of Ancient Egypt.
From the work of P.P. Oreshkin it logically follows that the state of the Etruscans, Ancient Egypt, Ancient India, Byzantium are components of the Great Empire of Rus', because the peoples inhabiting these components
spoke Russian.